Deadly Cupcakes

Game Discussion => Outside Azeroth - General Chatter => Topic started by: Marco on November 03, 2017, 11:09:42 AM

Title: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on November 03, 2017, 11:09:42 AM
This is the name of the next expansion.  Uncharted Islands, Warfronts, and Allied Races seem to be the big new features; more details should be forthcoming in the panel starting soon.

Cinematic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSJr3dXZfcg
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on November 03, 2017, 11:49:34 AM
The initial announcement video made it seem like Alliance and Horde will have disparate questing zones in Kul Tiras and Zandalar. Don't have virtual ticket, so can't watch the full "What's Next" panel about this but that would be very interesting if true. (+ Probably some neutral "uncharted islands" for the rest of questing? Or Zandalar and Kul Tiras are both Really Big.) edit: This appears to be true. Leveling questing is Horde in Zandalar, Alliance in Kul Tiras, and then you can go to the other faction's areas at max level.

Not a huge fan of the faction war plot, but this will likely play out similar to Pandaria in that it starts off faction war, but then the Sha Void Lords.

Looks like there will be some shake-ups in the old world from this expansion. (Factions each losing a capital city? Hard to tell from Twitter.)

Allied Races are New Races. You interact with that faction on your main and are able to unlock the ability to make a character of that race. Allied Race characters start at level 20. Looks like Alliance get Void Elves, Dark Iron Dwarves, and Lightforged Draenei. Horde get Zandalari Trolls, Highmountain Tauren, and Nightborne Elves. (Sorry, Tweed. If you're coming back you gotta play Horde.) New Races have new racials, so like... That could make the min/maxing situation an adventure.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on November 03, 2017, 12:06:56 PM
Adding level scaling to the old world. Zones will have level ranges with caps. (Example, Northrend and Outland will both scale from 60-80). This is actually coming in 7.3.5?

We're losing our artifacts at the end of this expansion (as we knew), but it looks like there will be a similar system in a new amulet we'll get that will be used to upgrade certain armor slots? Idk, I'll have to see more on how this plays out. Could be shit, could be fine.

This wasn't discussed, but looks at character panes seem to imply we're getting another ilvl/stat squish? (example: https://twitter.com/sojogoes/status/926542165395701760 )

Uncharted Islands appears to be the return of 3-man scenarios.

New battleground will also be playable in 7.3.5.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Edalia on November 03, 2017, 12:20:51 PM
That trailer was super generic fantasy. It didn't make me care about the faction war at all, and both sides looked like dicks. God the faction war is so boring!
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Tweed on November 03, 2017, 12:23:08 PM
Horde get ... Nightborne Elves. (Sorry, Tweed. If you're coming back you gotta play Horde.)

This is actual horse shit and almost seems like it was designed for the sole purpose of keeping me away from the game with the next expansion.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on November 03, 2017, 12:25:17 PM
That trailer was super generic fantasy. It didn't make me care about the faction war at all, and both sides looked like dicks. God the faction war is so boring!

The faction war is my least favorite WoW thing.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on November 03, 2017, 12:26:36 PM
No more PvP/PvE server distinction. Looks like if you choose to flag in the open world, you get sent to a version of the map with other flagged people? Some quests PvP only. Some additional bonuses for doing WQs PvP-enabled to make up for the extra time you'll spend doing them.

10 dungeons at BfA launch. M+ continuing, with some updates. (To UI and probably to modifiers) 2 of these dungeons are already in a playable state at Blizzcon.

In addition to new arena (which will be playable in 7.3.5), next expac also will have two new arena maps.

First raid looks like a mash-up of Titan/Trolls/Old God shit. We will fight Queen Azshara in a raid later in the expansion.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on November 03, 2017, 12:49:53 PM
People getting a chance to play BfA stuff at Blizzcon are saying ilvl/stat squish seems to be real. Also, some buffs are back.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on November 03, 2017, 12:57:27 PM
Uncharted Islands seems to be the new scenarios (3-player role-agnostic).  They can be played either PvE or PvP, although I'm not sure if the PvP mode is a fight or a race.

Warfronts are 20-player PvE activities designed to feel a bit like playing an RTS game, so you're fighting an NPC army, building structures, and researching upgrades.  Could be potentially interesting.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on November 03, 2017, 01:27:10 PM
Race/class combos available for Highmountain Tauren, Nightborne, Lightforged Draenei & Void Elves here:
https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-us/battle-for-azeroth/features/allied-races
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: ghoselle on November 03, 2017, 02:41:31 PM
That trailer was super generic fantasy. It didn't make me care about the faction war at all, and both sides looked like dicks. God the faction war is so boring!

The faction war is my least favorite WoW thing.

Mine too.  Its sort of the thing I just wish they'd drop but never will.  I'd long thought night elves, trolls, tauren should go off and form their own faction...
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Piralyn on November 03, 2017, 03:12:12 PM
All the stuff I've heard/read about the announcement so far fills me with nothing other than "meh."

Guess it's been an expansion or two since there's been TROLLAPALOOZA or VOID EVERYWHERE.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Kharvek on November 03, 2017, 03:19:07 PM
Yeah.  The story I've not really cared about for awhile, and like everyone else I agree the faction war is the most awfully stitched together thing ever and if it's the focal point I will care even less than normal about the story.

I care far more about what exactly I will be doing, and what mechanical changes there will be to the things I like...which there hasn't been much info on.  I saw something that you give up your artifact, and the trait tree is somehow transposed into an amulet or some shit? 
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on November 03, 2017, 05:52:24 PM
Did they announce a schedule? Beyond the usual "when it's ready" stuff...
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on November 03, 2017, 07:46:51 PM
Class raid/party buffs returning confirmed:
http://www.wowhead.com/news=275398/class-raid-buff-abilities-returning-in-battle-for-azeroth
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on November 04, 2017, 01:40:00 AM
More on the stat squish, which appears to be more of an ilvl squish/readjustment/normalization:
http://www.wowhead.com/news=275408/blizzcon-2017-battle-for-azeroth-item-level-changes-and-stat-squish
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on November 04, 2017, 10:35:35 AM
No random-drop legendaries in the next expansion.  Some of the customization aspects of legendaries will reappear in the Azerite-customized equipment slots, but it won't be RNG-driven.  Warforged/titanforged will still be a thing, but won't apply to the Azerite-customized slots.  (I still don't know very much about Azerite customization or what slots it applies to.)

https://www.wowhead.com/news=275473/battle-for-azeroth-legendaries-and-titanforging
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Kharvek on November 04, 2017, 11:21:45 AM
I'm somewhat blah on the class buffs returning.  I saw it coming since they were like "Yeah, we went too far with bring the player, not the class" ....but I honestly really liked in the normal/heroic tier it really didn't matter what Tank/DPS/Healer slots you brought as long as everyone enjoyed the class they had.  I also felt like they did a good job with spreading unique resources to make classes feel unique to play even if they weren't bringing something like that.  (Most of these are all in the passive "Everyone does more X" anyway, which are fundamentally uninteresting and just add pressure to spread classes out)

I *still* think it will be the case that normal/heroic won't need to worry about this, but I feel like it will put some unnatural pressure on certain people to play the buff that's missing rather than what they'd have fun playing.

Mythic will definitely need to do this, but I'm way more okay with that.

Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: HeidiB on November 04, 2017, 01:05:36 PM
....but I honestly really liked in the normal/heroic tier it really didn't matter what Tank/DPS/Healer slots you brought as long as everyone enjoyed the class they had.

I know that at least one member of TRR had trouble finding a class/role combination that satisfied both the player and the raid, and with the changes to Hunter class I contributed way less than I'd have liked to.  (In my case, they did too good a job of differentiating the three specs, so when it turned out I sucked at MM I wasn't comfortable switching to BM.)

Even if they give half the classes buffs with identical effects, it will improve my game play experience.  I get warm fuzzies from being useful to the raid, so putting another little square on everyone's buff list is an easy way to make me happy.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on November 04, 2017, 02:07:00 PM
I enjoy bringing needed buffs to a group -- it makes me feel useful even if I'm having an off-day too, Heidi! But it's definitely frustrating as far as building teams goes. But it might help me when it comes time to picking a main next expansion too.

It looks like all the buffs so far are only provided by a single class, and that all specs of that class provide the same buffs. There's no known party buff for shamans yet, and it's unclear if hunters will be able to contribute missing buffs with pets again.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on November 04, 2017, 03:42:55 PM
Here's Wowhead's coverage of the Q&A
http://www.wowhead.com/news=275490/blizzcon-2017-world-of-warcraft-q-a

Confirmed that the current legendary system won't be continuing into 8.0.

6 New character slots per server.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on November 04, 2017, 05:42:52 PM
Most classes aren't getting huge talent overhauls (at least so far), but some differences were noted in the classes available for demo at Blizzcon. For example, elemental shaman's talent Lightning Rod is being replaced by their current artifact ability Stormkeeper.

Here's a list: http://www.wowhead.com/news=275485/all-the-new-battle-for-azeroth-talents-and-calculator-now-live
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Kudger on November 04, 2017, 05:47:56 PM
I'm intrigued by some of the news from this expansion. I agree that the faction war is pretty terribly presented but too many fans are married to their faction's identity so I don't think Blizzard can/will ever get rid of it. If done right it might still be salvageable, especially if they get rid of the whole "we must unite for the greater good" plot device that first came about in WCIII and that they've re-used every expansion since WotLK.

I'm really curious what the driver was behind getting rid of true "always on" PvP servers. I suspect either sub numbers so low they need to put everyone in the same pool or sub numbers on PvP servers so low that they're being done away with?

Honestly though, I'm not sure where WoW goes after this next expansion. If we beat both Azshara and Zandalar, and the faction war comes to a climax, what's left? Whenever I think about the void lords I have an image of the raid being in giant Gnomish/Goblin mech suits in outer space and the void lords are flinging old gods at us like baseballs.   

Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on November 04, 2017, 07:00:46 PM
My suspicion is that the PvP server changes are a predecessor to connecting more servers. Not necessarily due to low sub numbers, but because people are continuing to consolidate on a few mega servers. (ie. I know a few people who have quit entirely, but more who have left ER for WrA or MG)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on November 04, 2017, 07:07:18 PM
We'll get six more per-server character slots with the new expansion due to allied races.  (That will mark the first time they've bumped the number of slots due to new races as opposed to new classes, and the first time they've bumped it by more than one.)

We will also be able to expand the base backpack size "slightly" if we use an authenticator.  For aesthetic reasons, I hope this is four more slots, but I bet it will be just two.

To answer Kudger: I don't think they need to eliminate the PvP server distinction based on subs.  There are still a lot of server clusters they could combine, and populations haven't declined significantly based on public numbers.  (For example, in this post from August 2014 (https://www.deadlycupcakes.org/forums/index.php?topic=3283.msg47638#msg47638) I noted that realmpop.com had Earthen Ring at 91K population, and today it has it at 198K.  It's possible that their methodology has changed, I guess.)  realmpop.com also believes that 40% of US players are on PvP servers.  I think the reason they gave is probably the correct one: that the current rule set doesn't work now that you can just group finder over to a PvE realm.

https://www.wowhead.com/news=275490/blizzcon-2017-world-of-warcraft-q-a-more-character-slots-larger-backpack-upright
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Kudger on November 04, 2017, 11:04:30 PM
That would make sense, Marco. I still think Blizzard is being driven by a desire to pool everyone together, whether that be due to a decline in subs or them considering the server distinction obsolete at this point (maybe both?).

I think it's more than simply because of group finder making it easy to go over to PvE; maybe they're also becoming more concerned about the predatory behavior of ganking lower lvl toons at choke points such as the dark portal in Outland, especially since this expansion is the first since Cata address the lower leveling experience.

I tip my hat to the current devs for not being afraid to shake things up, that's for sure.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on November 05, 2017, 12:31:50 AM
Some preliminary ability changes for BFA based on stuff from the Blizzcon demo: http://www.wowhead.com/news=275396/battle-for-azeroth-class-ability-changes-on-the-demo-floor

* There are a good amount of tank spell tweaks. I can't parse if these indicate a particular design direction in re: tanking because I don't tank, but that's the specs that seem to have the most changes thus far.
* Return of a few pruned spells: Soothe, Hibernate, Tranq Shot
* Looks like their current plan is to overall nerf AOE Stuns. Leg Sweep, Mind Bomb, Cap totem, etc. all have reduced stun duration in this list.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on November 05, 2017, 07:50:29 AM
Gleaned from an interview: there are no plans to have a follower mechanic (as in garrison or order hall missions) in the next expansion, as there isn't a compelling hook for it in the story.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKhGEj3-y8o (about 4:35 in)

ETA: there's also some discussion about world PvP.  One possible driver for the changes is that each faction has its own new continent, but world quests will take you to the other faction's continent.  That might not be a good experience on a PvP server under the current rule set, but could be a cool experience with PvP opted into if things work differently.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on November 05, 2017, 08:55:56 AM
There may be a great description of the Heart of Azeroth / Azerite system, but I haven't found it.  In this interview there was a short verbal description.  What I took away from it:

* The Heart of Azeroth is itself an amulet; the upgrade system applies to helm, shoulders, and chest.

* Each item in those slots will have four "circles" (think talent rows) of abilities, where the circles are progressively unlocked as you level up your amulet.

* The abilities will be handcrafted and fixed per item name, not randomized like the Netherlight Crucible.  Better items will have more powerful abilities.  (Recall that these slots cannot be warforged/titanforged.)

* These slots can still hold tier gear (the Blizzard person mentioned tier shoulders as a possible item you might have in that slot), so they're not doing anything so dramatic as doing away with tier sets or taking head/shoulders/chest away from the tier slots.

No mention of whether you can respec an item.  It also sounded like the first circle might specialize an item into damage, healing, or tanking, in which case we might lose the ability to use a single set of tier gear and have it be equally good for all specs.   On the flip side, we will only have a single Heart of Azeroth, not a separate one for each spec as we do with artifact weapons.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4lslLXhzrw (about 6:25 in)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Kharvek on November 05, 2017, 08:57:38 AM
So they've said the whole amulet/azerite armor thing is where some of the legendary stuff is going to live, and probably some of the artifact stuff, but for a lot of classes the artifact included a pretty important rotational ability that I can't imagine just dropping cold turkey the instant we fire this thing up.

IE: Assassination and Kingsbane.  Kingsbane is one of your biggest sources of damage and maximizing it is kind of the fun part of assassination right now.  I wonder if some of those just...become part of the class.  (It's what I'd assume anyway, just coming up with some lore'ish reason why the ability is no longer tied to the artifact)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on November 05, 2017, 09:07:44 AM
At least some specs will be having an artifact ability baked in, or moved to a talent selection.

* Elemental shaman will have a version of the current on-use Stormkeeper ability as a 100 talent.
* Retribution paladins will be getting Wake of Ashes as a talent as well.
* Fire Mages are getting Phoenix Flames as a level 60 talent
* Outlaw Rogues are getting Loaded Dice as a talent.
*  It doesn't look like Kingsbane is being made a talent at this time [although this could be a change that happens later in development], but Poison Bomb is becoming a talent.)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on November 06, 2017, 09:22:44 PM
From the dev interview with finalbosstv, I got the sense that follower missions might reappear in some form after all, partly because they like order resources as a world quest reward.  Or they might not.  Similarly, per-class raid buffs are an experiment right now; they might make it to release or they might not.  (These impressions were from the video, not the transcript.)

http://finalboss.tv/main/2017/11/5/blizzcon-2017-dev-interview-transcript
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on November 14, 2017, 03:31:32 PM
* These slots can still hold tier gear (the Blizzard person mentioned tier shoulders as a possible item you might have in that slot), so they're not doing anything so dramatic as doing away with tier sets or taking head/shoulders/chest away from the tier slots.
Or maybe they are.  In an interview with gameinformer, Ion said "We're currently not planning on carrying forward traditional raid class sets."

http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2017/11/14/world-of-warcraft-removing-traditional-raid-sets-in-battle-for-azeroth.aspx
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on November 14, 2017, 04:10:59 PM
I feel like high end of Azerite armor may give the type of bonuses we normally associated with tier bonuses.

Looks like they're going to have more appearance sets that are dungeon/raid aesthetic based rather than try to make certain appearance sets match the feel of certain classes. Will have to see this in action b/c there's some worry for me it's gonna end up like TOGC where there was just one cloth look, one leather look, one mail look, one plate look. Although ,going off that, might mean they do a tier where Horde and Alliance have different looks out of the same raid.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on November 15, 2017, 06:51:45 AM
In an interview with gameinformer, Ion said "We're currently not planning on carrying forward traditional raid class sets."

I question the value of set bonuses in a world with high-end Mythic+ gear. Right now all my tier slots are occupied either by legendaries or Mythic pieces that are 925 or 930. Is it really worth losing that many ilvls to put on a 915 heroic tier set?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on November 15, 2017, 07:17:22 AM
Generally yes in today's design, at least after you take into account the likely amount of warforging/titanforging bonuses on the set pieces acquired by someone who is regularly clearing heroic Tomb.  The combined 2-piece and 4-piece set bonuses usually add up to something like a +10% improvement, which is worth somewhere in the vicinity of 40 item levels on the four pieces of gear.  Set bonuses can also make a rotation feel better, which has a non-quantitative value.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Kharvek on November 15, 2017, 08:46:48 AM
Yeah, unless the bonuses are bad, they're generally way better than equivalent higher ilvl pieces.  I held on to my previous tier pieces for quite awhile since that set bonus was freaking awesome.  The current set bonuses are a little less good, but still good enough to be better than the gear I get from M+ runs.

I'd really like to see how this whole azerite system looks and feels since getting the set bonuses was one of the more fun parts of getting raid loot.  I don't really care when I get 300 more mastery since I don't actually feel the change there, but obviously in the numbers it matters.  Stuff like set bonuses and trinket perks can actually impact my rotation and how it feels to play the class, and that kinda thing is more fun on a progression side. 

Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on November 15, 2017, 01:09:28 PM
I feel like high end of Azerite armor may give the type of bonuses we normally associated with tier bonuses.
I've been watching some Blizzcon interviews with Jeremy Feasel and I think that's correct.  Since every helm, shoulder, and chest can have a completely new set of choices, we could find that the Azerite upgrades for T23 drops have a very different impact from the upgrades for T22 drops.  There could also be synergies between upgrades which encourage specific combinations of head/shoulder/chest items.  It won't feel quite the same, because they have to give us (I think) four choices on each item for each upgrade level, whereas set bonuses are fixed per tier per class.

Another new-to-me detail is that a higher-level head/shoulder/chest item might have a higher threshold for unlocking upgrades than a lower-level item.  So it won't be a closed system like the Netherlight Crucible where once you've hit 75 artifact traits you've unlocked all of the upgrade levels for all relics until the end of the expansion.  A danger with this system (depending on the tuning) is that you might get a really awesome helm upgrade that isn't worth equipping until you've spent a lot of time grinding out Azerite.  (Remember though that heads/shoulders/chests can't be warforged or titanforged in BFA, so there's no danger of actually liking an item less because it's titanforged beyond your immediate ability to unlock upgrades on it.)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Piralyn on November 15, 2017, 01:10:43 PM
Yeah, unless the bonuses are bad, they're generally way better than equivalent higher ilvl pieces.  I held on to my previous tier pieces for quite awhile since that set bonus was freaking awesome.  The current set bonuses are a little less good, but still good enough to be better than the gear I get from M+ runs.

I'd really like to see how this whole azerite system looks and feels since getting the set bonuses was one of the more fun parts of getting raid loot.  I don't really care when I get 300 more mastery since I don't actually feel the change there, but obviously in the numbers it matters.  Stuff like set bonuses and trinket perks can actually impact my rotation and how it feels to play the class, and that kinda thing is more fun on a progression side.

Yeah--I feel like if they do indeed kill off class sets, they're going to have to do something to make individual gear pieces more exciting--procs, something. With some kind of stat/ilvl squish happening again, it's going to be real hard getting excited about +30 mastery on a new item or something. Procs would help with that, but I imagine it would be tough to create a ton of those. The stat squish before kind of made gear feel shitty, but at least we had tier set/class bonuses then. Not sure that I like everything going into some ephemeral resource that powers up a single item that can do some stuff, and everything else is just a few stat points here and there.

We have some of that with artifacts now, sure, but--again--tier sets still add some variety.

Hopeful some kind of gameplay or engineering changes are mindblowing once they get to that point, because most everything that's dripped out so far has been super disappointing and makes it pretty likely I'll end up taking this expansion off.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Kharvek on November 15, 2017, 01:30:25 PM
Yeah.  I'm still gonna play and raid since I generally enjoy it and enjoy the folks I play with, but I gotta say this is probably the least excited I've been for an expansion.

Legion overall has been such a good expansion too.  I think they made mistakes with it, but I think they got way more right than they got wrong with this one and they've got the game in such a good place.  Nothing I see points to them ruining anything, but nothing they're adding has me really excited or intrigued.

Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on December 01, 2017, 10:52:08 AM
Important Void Elf update for Jeni: at least some of the hair options are glowing void tentacles
https://twitter.com/Wowhead/status/936667544269733888
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Jenilea on December 03, 2017, 08:33:34 PM
Important Void Elf update for Jeni: at least some of the hair options are glowing void tentacles
https://twitter.com/Wowhead/status/936667544269733888
Cool!
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on December 09, 2017, 01:17:01 PM
Wowhead's PTR dressing room now lets you look through customization options for: Void Elf, Lightforged Draenei, Highmountain Tauren, and Nightborne. Looks like the male void elves get glowing tentacle hair options too and omg I want one.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: **andius on December 22, 2017, 02:01:58 PM
So when do people think it is going to come out?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on December 23, 2017, 07:07:46 AM
All we have to go on so far is a Blizzcon announcement and a target calendar year (2018).  And of course it's very unlikely to be in Q1 of 2018 because there's been no alpha or beta release and Antorus is still pretty new.

Historically there has been at least a year between the announcement and the release for every expansion except Mists (which was 11 months).  But that's not necessarily reliable as most release announcements have been at Blizzcon, which is at a fixed point in the calendar year.  I recall interviews saying that Blizzard anticipated a Warlords release much earlier in 2014 than the actual November release, but experienced a roughly six-month delay to redo some of their leveling zones.  They also have a larger team, have had a pretty aggressive content release schedule for Legion, and have talked about wanting to shorten the end-of-expansion content gap.  If they had anticipated a late 2018 release for BfA from the get-go, they might have spaced out the Legion raids by another month each.

So, I will be surprised if the release date is earlier than early June, just because the alpha/beta cycle usually takes that long.  I will be disappointed but not terribly surprised if it's later than late August.  If it's later than early October, then I will think that something went awry in their production schedule, but that's not without precedent.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on December 23, 2017, 08:38:02 AM
I've largely seen speculation of August/September, but we have nothing concrete to base that on.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on January 12, 2018, 03:26:38 PM
wowhead weekly reports that allied race unlocks are account-wide, not faction-specific.  I believe this is based on what's observable in the UI on the PTR, not an official Blizzard announcement, so it could still change.  But as we understand things now, you shouldn't need to grind out Highmountain Tribe or Nightfallen rep and quest achievements on a horde character just to be able to unlock the creation of Highmountain Tauren or Nightborne characters.  (But any characters you create of those races must still be horde characters.)

Dark Iron Dwarves and Zandalari Trolls might be a different matter.  Not as much of the implementation of those races is visible yet, and it seems less likely that you'd even be able to do the unlocks for those races on a character of the other faction.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on January 25, 2018, 08:48:25 PM
BfA(*) testing is apparently about to begin, as there is a build available for downloads and the usual sites are datamining it.  mmo-champion is calling this an alpha, while wowhead is calling it a beta.  I think wowhead is in line with Blizzard as their recent class design post (https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-us/news/21366970) talked about upcoming beta testing.

The historical length of the testing period has increased with each expansion (if my notes and calculations are correct):

* BC: 95 days
* Wrath: 119 days
* Cata: 160 days
* Mists: 188 days
* Warlords: 224 days (85 alpha, 139 beta)
* Legion: 281 days (171 alpha, 110 beta; alpha began before December holidays)

But since we're evidently not having a period labeled "alpha", maybe we should expect the testing period to be shorter.

(*) Nobody can agree on what to nickname this expansion: "Battle", "Baz", "Bazeroth", or (from Taliesin and Evitel) "'froth".  "BfA" works okay in print but doesn't roll off the tongue.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on January 25, 2018, 11:42:19 PM
A relevant tweet in the "What do we shorten Battle For Azeroth to?" discussion:
https://twitter.com/frigbiscuits/status/956245023867179009

Personally, I think it's a winner.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on January 27, 2018, 02:51:13 PM
A lot of alpha stuff is being datamined right now and mostly all I feel is playable fat humans and skinny humans when, Blizzard? WHEN????
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: **andius on January 30, 2018, 10:57:52 AM
I see a upgrade option for Battle for Azeroth has appeared on the character select screen.
Given the anger people have felt about the changes to level having a 110 character boost shown as one of the three stand out point of upgrading is an odd choice.

Checking the site I learnt that : https://eu.shop.battle.net/en-gb/product/world-of-warcraft-battle-for-azeroth

Quote
Pre-purchase: Game is expected to release on or before September 21, 2018.

Yes there is a pet for the collectors Edition.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Piralyn on January 30, 2018, 11:53:22 AM
If you can get through the interminable queue to pre-purchase, you should be able to do the short quest(s) to unlock a handful of the allied races now, meaning you can play several of the allied races now.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Hotspur on January 30, 2018, 12:00:17 PM
I had several problems using a credit card directly, but using Paypal pointed at that same credit card worked just fine (a bit ago).
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on January 30, 2018, 12:03:36 PM
Does anyone know if new character slots unlock with prepurchase or on BofA release?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Hotspur on January 30, 2018, 12:05:10 PM
"The team is is working to get 4 extra character slots out to everyone in the next few days, regardless of if pre-purchase or not."
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: **andius on January 30, 2018, 01:44:25 PM
"The team is is working to get 4 extra character slots out to everyone in the next few days, regardless of if pre-purchase or not."

Not sure if it is to do with this but none of my characters now show up on the character select screen.

Edit: Seems from the forum I'm not the only one with this problem!
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on January 30, 2018, 02:09:18 PM
No more PvP/PvE server distinction. Looks like if you choose to flag in the open world, you get sent to a version of the map with other flagged people?
From the dev Q+A today, it sounds like on RP servers, you will only share zones with flagged people from the same server (except as affected by people using cross-server group invites).  On Earthen Ring, this design probably means your zones will be pretty empty if you go out with your PvP flag on, which could be useful at times if you don't mind the possibility of a fight.  But it also means if you actually want to do world PvP on a regular basis, a server like ours might not be the best place to be.

Of course, as they seem to be gearing up to do more realm connections, they could connect us with an RP-formerly-PvP server, at which point the expected number of flagged people from the same server cluster in a zone might rise substantially.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on January 30, 2018, 02:14:05 PM
A lot of the existing rp-pvp servers are on the Chicago datacenter and all except emerald dream are low pop, so I wouldn't be shocked.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on January 30, 2018, 02:15:15 PM
How might this affect the Wardens Tower and FFA PvP World Quests? I presently used World Quest Group Finder to assemble parties for the PvP dailies. Are cross-server group invites the norm; can an add-on activate them?

I can solo the Wardens Towers easily enough, but Black Rook Rumble might get tedious if I WQGF could only potentially invite people from Earthen Ring. On the other hand, the other FFA quests might become tolerable if I rarely encountered any other players there. 
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: **andius on January 30, 2018, 02:31:36 PM
The thread (https://us.battle.net/forums/en/wow/topic/20761008137?) about the problem is 167186 pages long and growing rather fast. I predict some emergencyplaned maintenance rather soon and it will not be quick.
If you have a raid planned for tonight I do not think your going :/
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on January 30, 2018, 02:54:01 PM
While we're waiting to be able to log in... here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDH0R8yFPmA
Have a video about the new allied races. The dude who made this is not someone I normally watch - it just popped up on my YouTube recommendations - and he seems to be pretty into the quest/RP part of the game. I do like the idea that leveling these new races will give heirloom gear, which I think is an excellent way to boost the leveling experience without having an impact on the end-game content.

Interesting that they may have finally cracked the nut of adding new races, meaning they could release a lot more. My guess is we won't keep getting character slots for them.

What do people think of the races that have been added?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on January 30, 2018, 03:07:55 PM
Note on Allied race unlocks: It looks like you will have to do the stuff on the correct faction to unlock a particular Allied race after all. :( So I guess I gotta get back on finishing Suramar Hordeside. :( :( :(

What do people think of the races that have been added?

Me, when Allied Races were announced: Void elves are so dumb. They're just there to keep the allied race number even between the factions and they basically came out of nowhere and personally I don't want them.
Me, today: WHEN WILL THE SERVERS BE UP SO I CAN MAKE GOTH ELVES BLIZZARD.

Anyway, Lightforged have nice hornz, so I'll probably level one eventually, but I don't care that much. Nightborne are rad AF, but I'm annoyed I have to do Suramar on a THIRD CHARACTER for them. Do not care at all about Highmountain Tauren. Very excited for Dark Irons and Zandalari.

Also, SKINNY AND FAT KUL TIRAN HUMANS BECOME PLAYABLE WHEN, BLIZZARD? WHEN?????
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: ghoselle on January 30, 2018, 03:26:03 PM
What do people think of the races that have been added?

Honestly, I think void elves should have been horde and the highmountain tauren should have been alliance.  The diet draenei (extra-light!) seem weird that they are even a race at all (do paladins become a different race when they dress in tier gear -- apparently if they are a draenei...).  Honestly, I'd probably have been more pleased if they just added highmountain tauren and nightborne and skipped the other 2. 

Its weird that I'm only really interested in races that ended up horde -- and I'm unlikely to get to see the horde side as my 110 horde character is my least favorite class so I've done no Suramar on them.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on January 30, 2018, 03:27:18 PM
Note on Allied race unlocks: It looks like you will have to do the stuff on the correct faction to unlock a particular Allied race after all. :( So I guess I gotta get back on finishing Suramar Hordeside. :( :( :(
That wasn't my interpretation of what Ion said in the Q+A.  He said you need a 110 horde character to run the intro quest to unlock an allied race, but the reputation/achievement requirements are account-wide across factions.

(https://www.twitch.tv/videos/224022383, 24:30 in)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on January 30, 2018, 03:31:28 PM
I'll have to check once I can log on & have purchased the pre-order (so like, probably not until tomorrow). I saw some people on Twitter reporting they couldn't unlock, with that situation but I might have misunderstood if they had a 110 of their alt faction to unlock the embassy.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on January 30, 2018, 04:44:29 PM
My reaction to the new races: Meh. They start at level 20, which means they don't have unique starting zones. Frankly, as I've leveled up alts solely to get pets, it's been the starting zones that have been the most interesting part of the game. In appearance they're just reskins of the existing races. I strongly doubt that any of their racial abilities are going to be game-changers.

And I'll bet some of those races have unique pets like Goblins do, just to be make life a bit more miserable for pet collectors.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Jenilea on January 30, 2018, 04:45:48 PM
I'll have to check once I can log on & have purchased the pre-order (so like, probably not until tomorrow). I saw some people on Twitter reporting they couldn't unlock, with that situation but I might have misunderstood if they had a 110 of their alt faction to unlock the embassy.
My horde 110, who has not started the Suramar questline, has got the quest for the Nightfallen. I have completed yet due to raid time.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on January 30, 2018, 06:59:35 PM
I just checked the first breadcrumb in the new-race plotlines. You have to be Exalted with at least one faction on Argus to go on them (Army of the Light for Lightforged; Argussian Reach for Void Elves). Just when I thought I'd had enough of Argus...
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on January 30, 2018, 07:10:24 PM
On the Horde side, the Highmountain Tauren questline requires being Exalted with the Highmountain Tribe, while the Nightborne requires Exalted with the Nightfallen. However, it only requires any of the toons on your account to have earned Exalted status. Yungi (Alliance Monk) has Exalted with both; Grotar (Horde Warrior) is Exalted with neither, yet he was allowed to pursue both questlines.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on January 30, 2018, 08:22:04 PM
I completed the Highmountain Tauren questline. It took about an hour. It's less interesting than Blizzard thinks it is; it involved too much searching through terrain to find the bosses to battle. Once complete, I saw I could create a new Highmountain Tauren character on the game's character-creation page (click "Allied Races"). I'll tackle the Nightborne tomorrow. It may be interesting, since Grotar never got far enough along the Suramar questline to have that disguise spell cast on him.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on January 30, 2018, 09:27:02 PM
The Nightborne quest only took about a half hour for me. The void elf quest was also pretty short although you have to wander around the Ghostlands a bit before you get to do the scenario. The Lightforged is all scenario, but the scenario is on the longish side.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on January 31, 2018, 06:24:22 AM
I'm sort of surprised at people buying the new expansion this early. My usual pattern has been to wait until I can poke at it on a beta server to make a buy/no-buy decision. Realistically, I'm going to buy because sunk investment but I'm not eager to throw more cash at Blizzard until I know what I'm getting for it.

So my questions for folk who've done this: do you typically buy the next expansion early? Did allied races influence you to buy early? Do you know enough now about the upcoming expansion to feel it's worth your early cash?

Honestly, I don't have a lot of time to investigate things first-hand (I don't even follow blue trackers anymore) so I rely a lot on word from people I know, and commentators I follow.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on January 31, 2018, 06:48:39 AM
You need to pre-purchase the expansion to unlock allied races, so that's probably a factor.

I'm not immediately into allied races (I like the idea of void elves but I have plenty of alts already) and I usually don't pre-purchase until later on, but while there's no rush for me, there's also no reason not to.  My sub is paid up until mid-2021 with wow tokens, I'm maxed on battle.net balance from wow tokens (around $350), I'm in a raid group which plans to continue, and I've never not enjoyed the game--even during the Warlords content drought when the overall player base grumbling was pretty loud.  Blizzard would have to muck things up way more than usual to make me regret spending fake bucks on BfA.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Kharvek on January 31, 2018, 06:58:01 AM
I'm in general in no rush to pre-purchase an expansion, but I usually do it sometime before release so if there's any preloading that needs to be done, I can do it.  There would need to be some catastrophically stupid decision in an expansion to make me think about walking away from it and I think Blizzard knows at this point not to rock the boat THAT much.  (IE: I don't think they're suddenly during an expansion going to turn this into an FPS or a match-3 puzzle game.)

Like Marco said I enjoy the game and I've got a solid and fun raid team that I want to continue playing with.  I don't pay with fake money and I pay with real money but even then it's not all that expensive considering the amount of time I put in, even if I literally just showed up for my two raids days I'd feel like I'm getting more than my money's worth.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on January 31, 2018, 08:18:33 AM
In general, most of the time, I think pre-purchasing digital downloads for AAA games is a bad choice for consumers to make, and mostly we shouldn't do it. I usually only pre-purchase by a few days before the expansion drops for WoW.

However, my current plan is to be a Void Elf monk next expansion, and rather than pay for a race change for my current monk, I wanted to just get the unlocks out of the way and level one during this expansion's doldrums. Like Kharvek and Marco, I have a stable raid team, and have enjoyed the game enough to keep playing it even during low points like Warlords, so it's a fairly safe bet I'll get my $50 worth out of the BFA purchase.

Also, I'm a huge hypocrite.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Piralyn on January 31, 2018, 10:30:50 AM
I'm in a raid group which plans to continue, and I've never not enjoyed the game

I've got a solid and fun raid team that I want to continue playing with
I have a stable raid team, and have enjoyed the game enough to keep playing it

Wait. Solid and fun? Enjoyable? Stable?

Am I being voted out of BCP?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on January 31, 2018, 10:56:09 AM
I pre-purchased the expansion. You can guess the reason. Hint: It begins with "p" and ends with "et".

In a potentially related question:

Out of curiosity, is there any word on how Allied Races will work for brand-new players? Will the new players forced to grind reputations in old Legion content before being able to play the new races in BofA and later expansions?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on January 31, 2018, 11:04:35 AM
For the moment yes, but in interviews they've said they could revisit those requirements as the Legion content fades into the past.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Fallowgrey on January 31, 2018, 12:37:09 PM
Quote
So my questions for folk who've done this: do you typically buy the next expansion early? Did allied races influence you to buy early? Do you know enough now about the upcoming expansion to feel it's worth your early cash?

I had substantial thoughts about using the final defeat of the Legion, the end of that massive storyline, as my out to finally retire.  Cut to yesterday at 3:30pm getting on and getting in line to pre-pay first thing.  What happened?

One, my spouse is still at the high end of the addiction: this is only his second xpac experience coming.  The man has been talking about getting his Void Elf every morning non-stop for the months since Blizzcon.  There are songs.

Two, I am still a slave to story.  I realize this makes me a sucker, esp. with all the retcons and dropped threads, etc.  But Legion was solid in my opinion, picking up lost threads and actually delivering story conclusions, so they get another shot.  I am worried about random-generated content creeping in, what with islands, etc.  But I think they'll go somewhere with characters and plot, too.  I got a feeling I made the right decision last night when I found my belf hunter in an all-elf scenario in Quel'thalas fighting alongside Alleria, me wielding her family bow, with the nightfallen I just helped free this xpac.  That Elf-a-paloosa makes me feel there will be lore/story rewards going forward, too.  Maybe not the ones you want, in the depth you want, but the little fun surprises and cool events that quests have been providing since vanilla.

Three, yeah, like others said, having a community like this one, and raiders to raid with, stable or insane, makes a huge difference.  What I do, how I improve in the game is important to *somebody* not me, and that's a draw when I myself feel a bit tired.

Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on January 31, 2018, 12:44:49 PM
Wait. Solid and fun? Enjoyable? Stable?

2 out of 4 ain't bad
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Piralyn on January 31, 2018, 01:20:12 PM
Wait. Solid and fun? Enjoyable? Stable?

2 out of 4 ain't bad

Do I want to know which two of the four I am?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on January 31, 2018, 01:21:44 PM
Nah. It's a fun surprise.

Anyway, the four new character slots are unlocked if you have the preorder. Rejoice.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Jenilea on January 31, 2018, 05:20:57 PM
You need to pre-purchase the expansion to unlock allied races, so that's probably a factor.

I'm not immediately into allied races (I like the idea of void elves but I have plenty of alts already) and I usually don't pre-purchase until later on, but while there's no rush for me, there's also no reason not to.  My sub is paid up until mid-2021 with wow tokens, I'm maxed on battle.net balance from wow tokens (around $350), I'm in a raid group which plans to continue, and I've never not enjoyed the game--even during the Warlords content drought when the overall player base grumbling was pretty loud.  Blizzard would have to muck things up way more than usual to make me regret spending fake bucks on BfA.
^ This is pretty much my situation too - well, except that after 13 years as a gnome, my warlock is now a tall elf!
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Fernia on February 01, 2018, 05:09:15 AM
Gotta say it's tempting to have a goth elf shadow priest....
Let's talk about the cost though:  $63CDN?!?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: jsoh on February 01, 2018, 05:29:29 AM
Maybe you shouldn't have splurged on that fancy car.

Btw. I mailed you some spare D-cells I had around the house. HTH.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Fernia on February 01, 2018, 07:13:22 AM
Might need them this summer:  Shawna is planning a road trip to the Maritimes.
I need to map out if there are charging stations < 200km a part all the way over...
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Jenilea on February 01, 2018, 09:22:38 PM
Gotta say it's tempting to have a goth elf shadow priest....
Let's talk about the cost though:  $63CDN?!?
It is CAN$63 for the xpac, which you will need at some point, and then CAN$32 to race change. That works out to be 5 tokens if you have the gold.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on February 07, 2018, 12:24:16 PM
BfA(*) testing is apparently about to begin, as there is a build available for downloads and the usual sites are datamining it.  mmo-champion is calling this an alpha, while wowhead is calling it a beta.
Testing officially began yesterday (11 days after I posted that, so not as soon as it seemed), and Blizzard is calling it an alpha.

https://us.battle.net/forums/en/wow/topic/20761726635
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on February 07, 2018, 07:07:14 PM
Friends and Family invites for the alpha are out. My goal is actually do some playtesting on this one, but probably mostly Hordeside.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on February 09, 2018, 10:37:42 PM
Great news, BCP healers! Looks like the current alpha build has moved talent tiers around such that there are more options for survivability for Windwalkers now. (I could have Healing Elixirs and Diffuse Magic... AT THE SAME TIME.) We lose Dampen Harm, tho. I'm interested to see the math on some of these -- there's a talent I like that kind of works against taking Whirling Dragon Punch, which I also like. :\

Anyway, here's a great achievement that was in the list (for Horde characters, idk if this will also be an Alliance thing but I HOPE IT IS):
(https://i.imgur.com/gYXovVN.jpg)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on February 10, 2018, 05:01:09 PM
In Bazeroth, it seems like many more physical specs' abilities will scale with attack power, not weapon damage, or at least they're trying that out on the test realm.  I'm not sure if the intent is to balance out how much each spec relies on weapon damage, or do away with weapon damage as a substantial contributor to DPS altogether.

https://www.wowhead.com/news=281764/battle-for-azeroth-class-abilities-scale-with-attack-power-instead-of-weapon-dam

Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on February 10, 2018, 07:36:18 PM
Important shaman update from current alpha build: Earth Shield seems to be coming back as a talent (it also seemed to be a talent option for Ele, which i guess is interesting?) also Tremor totem, and Cap totem as baseline.

also @Fallow:
(https://i.imgur.com/KutmYfQ.png)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on February 11, 2018, 11:25:25 PM
Okay, let's type up some notes from my alpha experiences. I haven't done any of the dungeons yet because the queues are, obviously, quite long, and the one time I tried to sit through one, I ended up crashing the game trying to Far Sight into Zuldazar and then didn't want to sit in the queue AGAIN.

Battle For Azeroth when?
Taliesin & Evitel said in their video about the alpha that they expect the release to be closer to the "no later than September 30, 2018" on the pre-order than not, and I agree with this. There are only two zones and two dungeons up on the alpha right now, and Drustvar still has a lot of subzones missing textures. A lot of specs are clearly in design flux (survival hunters), etc. So, I'd work with the assumption that that "no later than" date is probably... gonna be the date itself. I would not be super surprised if early-live BFA has that "rushed AF" feel.

Heart of Azeroth/Azerite
This is very hard to gauge on the alpha -- there doesn't seem to be any UI to show your Azerite progress right now, and so little Azerite dropped Hordeside I assumed it wasn't activated yet. Alliance-side there were actually leveling quests that gave Azerite, so I was able to level up the necklace a bit. Here are my thoughts so far:

* The necklace itself seems to start at 265 item level (more on item level later), and increasing the azerite level of the necklace also increases the item level of the necklace by one. (ie. a level 2 necklace will be item level 266 and so forth.)

* No quest rewards filled the chest or head slots in my questing in Drustvar or Nazmir, and overall quests didn't seem to give very much gear (and only for a few slots, repeatedly) so I suspect we may be seeing some early questing azerite armor in these slots to get us used to the concept, but it just hasn't been implemented yet. This is totally speculation on my part.

* It's hard to tell what rewards Azerite given the current state of alpha, but here we go:
- Just randomly drops when killing things. Sometimes I'd just get ~10 azerite or so off a random mob while questing.
- Some leveling quests in Drustvar (Alliance zone) gave 100 Azerite, so I suspect there are some quests in Nazmir which will have Azerite added in as their rewards later on.
- Random dungeon queue for leveling dungeons claims to give 35 azerite on completion.
- It's impossible to say if killing rares or looting chests gives Azerite, since at this point of the alpha, they're just dropping placeholder loot.

* Since there's no UI, I don't know the exact number, since I wasn't keeping track, but Azerite amount needed to get from level 1 to level 2 necklace seemed to be ~200 or so.

Item level Squish????
There's a stat/item level squish in BFA.

* Premade 110s on alpha start in 185 gear in all slots except the Heart of Azeroth necklace. This is likely roughly comparable to the gear on a boosted 110, since Legion beta premade 100s were essentially boosted characters in terms of gear as well.

* At 110 greens are 200, at 111: 208, at 112: 216, at 113: 224. Items that proc blue quality seem to be +10 item level. Assuming we continue with a pattern of +8 item level per character level, max level greens should be around item level 280.

* Non-tank HP seems to start around 14.5k at 110 at a 192 overall item level. My Horde monk, who didn't get any items from quests after level 111 hit 18k health at 113. My Alliance warlock, who got more gear from quests rewards is sitting around 19k.

* Harder hitting abilities are hitting for a few thousand damage at 110. Filler abilities hit for somewhat less, usually around ~400-500. Without mastery taken into effect, Healing Wave heals for ~1.6k at level 110. Healing Rain is ticking for ~150/tick no taking mastery into account.

* Generally, I'd say expect numbers somewhere between late Wrath and early Cataclsym.

So... what's the story like? Is it any good?
====VAGUE SPOILERS FOLLOW====
* Nazmir (Horde zone) is about helping the Zandalari try to get help from various loa to fight the Blood trolls. You interact with Bwonsamdi, Hir'eek (bat), Torga (turtle), and Krag'wa (frog). You meet and ally with the Tortollans. You meet a Titanic Keeper. There's some Old God shit. Storywise, this felt more complete than the Alliance zone. I suspect this zone may be the location of that troll/titan/old god raid that was teased.

* Drustvar (Alliance zone) has this whole European folk-horror aesthetic. Witches (who are a real thing, complete with Disney-evil-witch models) are hiding in plain sight and therefore some witch hunts ensue. You gotta fight the actual witches and help clear the names of innocents falsely accused of witchcraft. There are some neat new enemy models that have this whole Wicker Man aesthetic. Actually, the whole zone has kind of a Wicker Man (the good one) aesthetic. I haven't totally finished this zone yet. It appealed to me less than Nazmir but... Nazmir was a lot closer to Shit I'm Into. It's hard to top "Making a pact with a death loa who is definitely gonna screw you over in the future while hanging out in his awesome lookin REVIVAL!polis." Sorry guys.

====END SPOILERS====

* Overall, the Horde zone felt more finished from a story & art perspective (the cutscenes were textually storyboarded in Nazmir, in Drustvar you're just told that something cool will happen here before the next part of a quest. There weren't regions that were untextured in Nazmir, although there were a few temporary models), but the Alliance zone felt more finished mechanically (Drustvar had more quests that rewarded Azerite and items). Both areas have terrain/clipping issues and broken quests.

How many bug reports have you sent Blizzard on the alpha so far?
Easily 20.

Got any good screenshots?
I thought you'd never ask. (https://imgur.com/a/yz2Oj)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on February 12, 2018, 05:49:58 AM
Comment on vague spoilers:

Begin whining:
Witch-hunting in Dustvar is going to get some pushback from Wiccans. I remember, way back in Vanilla WoW beta, there was giant pentacle in Searing Gorge that they replaced with a more generic design by release. I always assumed they did this because Blizzard wanted to avoid any religious issues. I hope they wise up here as well.
End whining
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on February 12, 2018, 10:34:17 AM
Response:
1. I was listening to some videos where a guy dunks on the bad writing on the Game of Thrones television show while I did a lot of this questing, so I may have missed some of the exact details of this quest chain.

2. The actual "witch hunt" involves an innocent person being accused and about the be executed on the gallows and you stop them temporarily while trying to prove her innocence. You're eventually able to rescue her, and find out her family has a history of fighting corruption in this region and work together to find out what's going on for real in the area.

3. It seems to be heavily implied that the "witches" are not actual humans but genuinely something pretending to be human and occasionally acting as a corrupting influence on the humans in the region, and seems to largely be referred to as "witches" due to belief in evil witches being a part of the local vernacular. IIRC the further you go along in the quest chain, the less the term in used once it becomes clear you're dealing with something else.

4. The people whose families historically fight this bad stuff seem to also have occult trappings around them. (ie. you make potions, collect family relics, etc.) so I think it ultimately reads more as good witch vs. bad witch.

5. THAT SAID obviously if this reads super unpleasantly to you due to your religion, and I would recommend you look into the details yourself ahead of time if you're willing to do so/spoil yourself and giving your feedback on the subject to Blizzard, or to me to post to the alpha forums/in-game suggestion box. I am obviously not a member of this religion so it's difficult for me to gauge what is or is not offensive.

6. ALSO I had similar thoughts in re: some questing in Nazmir. Bwonsamdi is very clearly a WoW-style representation of Baron Samedi, an actual loa/religious figure in Haitian Voudoun and also some versions of syncretized Catholicism in the region. While ultimately I don't think it's significantly different from in-game representations of religious figures like Thor, Ra, etc. (all of whom are still worshipped by people in various strands of reconstructed paganism/heathenry), I genuinely don't know enough about Caribbean religions to know if this is culturally insensitive or fine. (The character obviously has some differences, but the inspiration is pretty clear.) I'm genuinely curious if the two zones they chose to put up are the two they most suspected may need re-writing for sensitivity reasons?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on February 12, 2018, 10:47:48 AM
Taliesin & Evitel said in their video about the alpha that they expect the release to be closer to the "no later than September 30, 2018" on the pre-order than not, and I agree with this.
Didn't the other two visible-to-the-public F&F alphas also start this way, though?  I remember running the Warlords intro scenario with a bunch of untextured terrain and placeholder text, and that was probably partway into beta.

That said, there are 236 days between February 6 when alpha began and September 30.  The combined alpha and beta period was 224 days for Warlords and 281 days for Legion, the latter including the 2015 winter holidays.  So releasing near September 30 wouldn't be surprising.  That possibility will become a likelihood if beta doesn't start before June.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on February 12, 2018, 11:11:24 AM
The initial F&F alpha for Legion was testing the DH class/starting zone, likely since that went live with Legion pre-purchase so it needed to be finished first. I didn't finish the zone (I suspect the untextured stuff was probably nearer the end of the zone), but there were definitely more class bugs/random errors on that part of the Legion F&F alpha.

There have been some people able to glitch out of the areas we're allowed into to look around (mage shenanigans, shaman far sight tricks, etc.), and the other zones do seem to be largely complete as far as art, although I think many have the same untextured situations in places. People were also able to glitch into the starting scenarios for each class for a period of time on the alpha. (The alpha right now is only the two available zones + dungeons, so it doesn't officially include the intro-to-BFA stuff to get you to these islands or to get the Heart of Azeroth yet.) They weren't completable, but seemed to be mostly finished in terms of art, and some objectives in them could be completed, so these are probably closer to done than not.

It's also quite likely that while the F&F alpha is a working/playable/"we're willing to have the public look at this" build of these testable zones, there's an in-house build that's further along in some respects.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on February 13, 2018, 01:19:23 PM
New M+ affix datamined for BFA: Blight. Makes you do more damage/healing when not at full health. Interesting, but also profoundly terrifying to consider tbh
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: jsoh on February 13, 2018, 02:07:29 PM
No Mitch, You got no healing in order to _help_ you, not because I dont heal rogues. Dont be ridiculous.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on February 13, 2018, 03:11:04 PM
So, here are my thoughts on Blight, having had some time to think about it, and why I don't like it, assuming we're not all reading what it does incorrectly.
* If it doesn't also come with a +health% for mobs, it's basically a non-affix for people casually doing M+ content. You could just ignore it and be fine.

* It discourages healers from doing their jobs, and depending on what tier of affixes it's on, may encourage no-healer M+ again. Healer damage just isn't high enough in WoW for this to be an appealing affix.

* It's potentially very interesting in the context of an MDI/timed race situation, though.

* Has potential for interesting play for people pushing high keys/trying to punch above their weight class, but at this point, survivability/abilities one-shotting people also becomes a possibility, so it gets fiddly

* Seems to target disc specifically as a healer that both prevents/lowers incoming damage and has trouble catching up when players get suddenly low health.

The INVERSE (You do less damage when not at 100% health) is potentially a much more interesting affix, although has the potential to seriously fuck tank specs like Blood where doing damage/self healing is a major part of their survivability, and I think would have to not affect healing because otherwise you could get in a situation where you could just never recover if you got low enough health as a healer. This version still targets disc specifically as a healer, though.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on February 13, 2018, 03:22:07 PM
* If it doesn't also come with a +health% for mobs, it's basically a non-affix for people casually doing M+ content. You could just ignore it and be fine.
The mmo-champion description is "Damage and healing done increased when injured, and reduced when healthy."  So I don't think you can just ignore it.

Hopefully it's mutually exclusive with grievous.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on February 13, 2018, 03:56:33 PM
Unless every healer magically grows Cleric Stance and does at least ~50% of the damage of a DPS in BFA, it's a bad affix because it discourages bringing a healer at all.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Fallowgrey on February 14, 2018, 06:31:20 AM
also @Fallow:
(https://i.imgur.com/KutmYfQ.png)

8-O

No channel, either.  Not sure why they're letting it get reduced by Word-spam; at 12 minutes cooldown to start, even given a lot of Word casts, I doubt you'll get in a second cast, except on really, really long fights.  And don't you want to hold something like this until late fight craziness anyway?

Anyway, still awesome.  I hope the animation is good.  Angels everywhere.

Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on February 15, 2018, 06:39:36 AM
In Bazeroth, it seems like many more physical specs' abilities will scale with attack power, not weapon damage, or at least they're trying that out on the test realm.  I'm not sure if the intent is to balance out how much each spec relies on weapon damage, or do away with weapon damage as a substantial contributor to DPS altogether.
Apparently data mining didn't tell the full story here, as the formula for computing non-caster ability damage changed.  The new formula has been reverse-engineered, and it looks like all non-caster abilities will scale with (attack power + 7 * weapon DPS).  Another way to think about this is that all non-caster abilities scale with weapon DPS, with every 7 attack power adding one weapon DPS.  This seems similar to how Diablo 3 scales ability damage.

https://www.wowhead.com/news=281913/battle-for-azeroth-new-formula-for-calculating-ability-damage
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Piralyn on February 15, 2018, 07:08:26 AM
In Bazeroth, it seems like many more physical specs' abilities will scale with attack power, not weapon damage, or at least they're trying that out on the test realm.  I'm not sure if the intent is to balance out how much each spec relies on weapon damage, or do away with weapon damage as a substantial contributor to DPS altogether.
Apparently data mining didn't tell the full story here, as the formula for computing non-caster ability damage changed.  The new formula has been reverse-engineered, and it looks like all non-caster abilities will scale with (attack power + 7 * weapon DPS).  Another way to think about this is that all non-caster abilities scale with weapon DPS, with every 7 attack power adding one weapon DPS.  This seems similar to how Diablo 3 scales ability damage.

https://www.wowhead.com/news=281913/battle-for-azeroth-new-formula-for-calculating-ability-damage

I think this is a vast improvement over the alternative (abilities all scaling off of attack power rather than weapon damage). As a Feral Druid for a bit this expansion, my major ability only scaling off of AP felt really shitty and like I was lagging behind as people started getting higher ilvl artifact weapons. I know Frost DK has some things that scale purely off of AP too, but it's not like the mission critical abilities. Standardizing this, assuming it also compensates for dual-wielding or whatever, will go a long way toward helping all classes scale relatively similarly.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on February 21, 2018, 09:56:45 AM
Honor and I were talking about the item squish yesterday, and I happened to hear these item level correspondences on The Instance (I don't know what their source was):

1000 -> 280
970 -> 250
940 -> 220

So the alpha premades at 180 would correspond to 880 gear.

In other news, data mining suggests that First Aid is going away--the achievements are becoming legacy achievements, and bandages are becoming tailoring recipes.  So if you have your heart set on being Field Medic Gandalfidan, better grind that out soon.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on February 21, 2018, 08:29:08 PM
Quick clarification:
On live, 110 boost gear is 870 item level. Presumably this corresponds to the 185 item level green gear that premade 110s start with on the alpha, but cannot confirm.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on February 23, 2018, 08:18:48 PM
wowhead has an article on the stat squish here: https://www.wowhead.com/news=282185/battle-for-azeroth-item-level-and-stat-scaling-changes

The data presentation probably could have been improved by interpolating fractional stat values, but that's not really important.  Two things of note:

* They appear to be squishing the differential power of the first half of Legion gear (up through Nighthold).  This is a departure from the first squish, but it seems okay.  Since it's easy to obtain 880-910 gear right now, it isn't important for there to be a large power difference between someone in fresh 110 gear (perhaps someone who hit level 110 and unsubbed) and someone in end-of-expansion catch-up gear.

* Secondary stat scaling in BfA may be linear rather than exponential.  (Primary stat scaling remains exponential.)  This makes some sense, in that you shouldn't really be gaining percent-of-haste and percent-of-crit in larger increments for later upgrades in an expansion than you do for earlier upgrades.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Piralyn on February 28, 2018, 12:31:05 PM
Sweet zombie Jesus the Zandalari Moonkin Form is nightmare fuel.

(https://media.mmo-champion.com/images/news/2018/february/ZandalariMoonkin.jpg)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on February 28, 2018, 01:05:44 PM
My Horde druid confirmed for Zandalari.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on March 02, 2018, 06:03:47 PM
No more PvP/PvE server distinction. Looks like if you choose to flag in the open world, you get sent to a version of the map with other flagged people? Some quests PvP only. Some additional bonuses for doing WQs PvP-enabled to make up for the extra time you'll spend doing them.
It appears the first of these benefits is that your PvP talents are always active in the open world if you're in "war mode", which can only be toggled in Stormwind or Ogrimmar.  PvP talents are being revamped so that there are no more talent rows; instead I think you pick one from the trinket row and three from the remaining pool.  PvP talent slots are unlocked as you level, so there is no more initial honor grind at max level to enable talents.

In completely unrelated news, data mining has hinted at a possible new "communities" feature.  Diablo 3 has a feature with that name, which I have used exactly once (to get a conquest done).  I think they are basically cross-realm chat channels, but that alone has a lot of potential.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on March 07, 2018, 10:22:56 AM
I got an invite to the F&F Alpha today, a first for me. I've gotten beta invites before but never an alpha.

Is it OK to post alpha stuff here or do we want a (redacted) thread for people to avoid spoilery stuff or what?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on March 07, 2018, 10:35:43 AM
Me too, apparently.

For story spoilers I would suggest a separate thread.  For systems and technical stuff this thread is fine.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on March 07, 2018, 10:53:51 AM
Me three. I'd try it if I knew I could keep any pets I captured.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Jenilea on March 07, 2018, 07:04:32 PM
Well, I got no email or notification from Blizzard, but I had a look at my region/account choices and there was an alpha wow listed. So I wondered if... and then clicked install. It quickly said playable and I started up to see the Legion opening cinematic. :(

However, after I was finally able to escape out of that, I got to the character creation screen and finally saw a BofA loading screen. I have created an alliance toon on Sylvanas.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on March 08, 2018, 07:08:11 AM
FTR I'm also playing on Sylvanas, but Hordeside, and haven't leveled past the initial 113 I reached when the alpha first launched.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: HeidiB on March 08, 2018, 07:55:31 AM
I'm Aspne on Sylvanus.  Level 110 and somewhat lost.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on March 15, 2018, 03:29:56 PM
A few notable takeaways from today's Q+A with Ion:

* We should expect personal loot to become mandatory for current-tier raids.  There won't be much remaining demand for group or master loot without set piece tokens, except for split-runs which are bad for the raiding scene anyway.  Split runs can still convey some advantage with personal loot, but not nearly as much.

* Mythic+ will move fortified/tyrannical to the +2 tier so that they don't create such a big breakpoint at +10.  The design team doesn't like the new affixes they've tried out so far and will likely be trying out new ones.  Josh Allen suggested "flocking," where seagulls constantly spawn and attack you, and was summarily fired by Ion.

* Professions will no longer have a universal skill number which grows with each expansion; instead each expansion will have a separate skill number.  This change does mean that if you want to make, say, Wrath tailoring gear for transmog, you might have to go level your Wrath tailoring in order to do so; you won't get that skill progression for free as part of the catch-up for a later expansion.  (I don't know what will happen in the transition; it seems likely that current tailors going into BfA will be grandfathered for Outland through Legion, but I didn't hear that specifically addressed.)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on March 15, 2018, 08:11:10 PM
Is there any indication that crafting professions might be of more use in BfA? I don't think I crafted a single item in Legion that was of actual use on any of my toons; I only crafted for the skill level and for WQs. And does this "universal skill number" apply only to crafting, or to gathering as well?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on March 15, 2018, 08:41:45 PM
That question was asked, and the answer sounded like we should expect more of the same, because all of the ways to make crafted gear more relevant don't make a lot of sense today.  Crafted gear has been of interest to a segment of players at a couple of specific points in the expansion, but mostly only players who were willing to pour lots of gold into obliterum in order to get a piece with just the right secondary stats when the max upgraded item level was competitive with gear from other sources.  Set pieces and legendaries cut into that as the expansion went along, to the point where the Argus crafted pieces were never interesting.

Alchemy, enchanting, and jewelcrafting are always in demand, of course.  Vantus runes from inscription were of market interest sometimes, but they don't sell very quickly on this realm, I think because raiders tend to forget they exist.  The raid groups I was in would use them when we ran into trouble on a boss, but not often.

The Q+A didn't address gathering.  Continuing the star system from Legion seems like the most likely approach for gathering in BfA, with no need for a points system on top of that.  But past expansions have used the scraps approach (you get a few things which combine 10:1 into the actual material until you skill up), so they will need to do something to bridge that gap.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on March 16, 2018, 07:08:48 AM
It has seemed to me like WoW developers regretted putting crafting into the game and have done things every expansion to make it harder/worse/less relevant. At least for the past five or so years...
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: ghoselle on March 16, 2018, 07:25:11 AM
It has seemed to me like WoW developers regretted putting crafting into the game and have done things every expansion to make it harder/worse/less relevant. At least for the past five or so years...

I think they have a weird love/hate relationship with it.

To one extent, they like how it drives folks to go collect materials and wander the current content.  They like people going and collecting recipes.
They like how it can sort of provide a path to some catch-up gear for leveling.
They seem to actively like consumables (alchemy, enchanting, cooking).

To the other extent, they don't like it as a way to get relevant gear.  They don't want to make normal gearing paths irrelevant.  They've had multiple times when they've accidentally made a crafted piece disproportionately good, which they don't like.  And by default, they want to not make crafting required for anyone.

Personally I treat crafting recipes a lot like pets - I try to collect them all, but rarely use them.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Andraax on March 16, 2018, 01:26:24 PM
New item in latest build:
Pineapple Pizza: Use: Restores no health, and reduces Stamina by 5% for 30 sec.  (1 sec cooldown).  "Just terrible."

For once, a realistic item. :)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: **andius on March 19, 2018, 03:39:53 PM
A lot of people must be doing the Alpha even I have got it.

From first play Beast Master hunter feel unfinished, Arcane mage feels a lot more done.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on April 05, 2018, 07:02:16 AM
The release date for BfA will be August 14.  There's a new short trailer for it at the first link below, but it's not a big cinematic piece like we got in the Blizzcon reveal.  Asked when the prepatch would be, Ion's answer was (wowhead paraphrase): "Pre-patch is likely a few weeks before the actual expansion, similar to past expansion schedules. Ion said not to quote him directly on this, nothing is official."

This puts the total alpha+beta time for BfA at 189 days, shorter than Legion (281) and Warlords (224).  Mists had a beta period of 188 days and no alpha period.

https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-us/news/21669948/battle-for-azeroth-arrives-august-14
https://www.wowhead.com/news=283326/bfa-press-event-talanji-cinematic-8-0-pre-patch-maghar-and-dark-iron-unlock-sche
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on April 05, 2018, 08:01:25 AM
The press event Q+A was a whole lot of the usual "that's an interesting question, and we can't talk about that except to repeat things we've already said," but there was this interesting tidbit from the wowhead summary of an interview with Jeremy Feasel:
Quote
When you unlock the Islands feature by completing the War Campaign, it will also unlock for all of your alts. If you want to level up your alts by doing Islands, they will let you.
So similarly to how we can level alts in legion invasions now, it sounds like we will be able to level alts using islands in BfA.  I would guess that this will be restricted to the lowest difficulty and there will be level scaling like Legion has for normal-mode dungeons.

https://www.wowhead.com/news=283330/battle-for-azeroth-muffinus-interview-island-expeditions-wrathion
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on April 17, 2018, 06:03:06 PM
Warfronts were tested for the first time today, giving people a sense of what they will be like.  They were really laggy and enemies would sometimes evade and people who leave the group weren't replaced and (given all of those things) there were too many attacking alliance waves to make progress, but the general shape of the system is clear.  (If you don't remember what Warfronts are, they are 20-player PvE scenarios where you fight against enemy faction NPCs, which will be available to one faction at a time while the other faction gathers resources to enable it on their side.)

Essentially: you spawn on an attacking ship and establish a foothold on one side of the map.  From there you can capture a lumberyard and a mine, allowing your team to gather wood and iron which is used to build and upgrade structures.  Individual players contribute resources towards goals to control the order of upgrades.  The general effect of these upgrades is to send more and stronger NPC troops out of your base towards the enemy base, making it easier to take map objectives and eventually the enemy base.  So, sort of like a versus-AI MOBA with twenty players.

Most of the feedback I saw was positive despite the poor play conditions.  There is some concern that the novelty might wear off quickly, especially as people gear up.  I suspect Blizzard's answer to that will be to add new warfronts in odd-numbered patches, with each new one tuned for the current average gear level.  Also, the system seems self-tuning to a point: if your team outgears the scenario, it can push further without waiting for upgrades, but will encounter more resistance as you won't have as much NPC support.

https://www.wowhead.com/news=283632/battle-for-azeroth-stromgarde-warfronts-testing
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on April 24, 2018, 04:38:48 PM
Blizzard announced the transition from alpha to beta test today, and did a character wipe on the test realms.  That leaves 112 days for beta testing, which is actually two more than Legion had.  (Of course the pre-patch systems have to be ready a few weeks sooner, as always.)  There has been a big push to add content to the alpha realms in the last few weeks, and they seem to be much closer to having a full-featured test now.

A couple of random things I wanted to note:

* There's a new in-game voice chat system, which I believe actually works this time.  I noticed that when I joined a group for a warfront, it asked me if I wanted to join the group voice chat; I assume that also applies to dungeon finder groups, LFR, island expeditions, etc..  This is a potential game-changer for matchmade groups; whether that change is good or bad remains to be seen.  You can always say no, of course, and I don't expect there to be a lot of pressure to use voice chat in matchmade groups.

* Bay from finalboss.tv has been doing a series of first-pass videos where he goes over each spec, how it has changed, and what he thinks the talent builds are likely to be.  There are of course likely to be more changes, especially in the numbers (and more than that to unholy/frost DKs and prot warriors according to a blue post (https://us.battle.net/forums/en/wow/topic/20762217984#4)), but these are really nice in-depth looks at how talents interact with each other and what gameplay will be like in different builds.  I believe he typically does a second pass closer to release.

https://www.youtube.com/user/finalbosswow/videos
https://us.battle.net/forums/en/wow/topic/20762097798#1
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on May 13, 2018, 10:49:00 AM
Some PvP stuff, accumulated since a lot of us don't care much about PvP:

* If you have war mode enabled, in addition to getting to use your four PvP talents all the time in world content, you will get +15% experience and +10% world quest rewards.  This sort of means the "right" way to level quickly on day one is with war mode enabled, as there won't be many opposing-faction players on your faction's continent yet.  (Even after that, see this experiment Taliesin did about ganking (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkt5--wg6W4&t=16m24s), concluding that you're not going to get quickly killed by a max-level opponent).

* Stat templates in instanced PvP are gone.  Instead, when players attack other players, internal scaling magic will compress the relative power differences in gear, so that big item level differences will convey much smaller power differentials than they would in PvE.  This will also apply in world PvP.  Getting healing to work properly in this model seems challenging; they didn't talk about that.

* Acquiring gear from PvP will be more deterministic; there will be a conquest bar that you fill up, and each week there will be a specific item slot that you get gear in from filling up the bar, ending with weapon.  If you miss a week there is a catch-up mechanic; I didn't understand the details.  Conquest can be obtained from world PvP as well as BGs and stuff.

* If you kill a lot of enemy players in world PvP, you will get a bounty placed on your head (for conquest points, I think), and everyone will be able to see where you are on the map.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on May 13, 2018, 03:42:37 PM
It sounds like Honor Points are being replaced by Conquest Points. Does this mean if people want current Prestige PvP rewards, they might want to start grinding before the expansion?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on May 13, 2018, 06:56:32 PM
It sounds like Honor Points are being replaced by Conquest Points.
No, I think conquest points are an addition, not a replacement.  You can't have the same currency (or counter) track both prestige rewards and current-season PvP gear rewards.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on May 15, 2018, 09:47:01 PM
The latest beta build added a Brutosaur mount, which looks a bit like a brontosaurus, costs five million gold, and has an auctioneer NPC on its back.

While the last super-expensive mount (the spider) was intended more as a reward for gold-making than as a gold sink according to Blizzard, this one may sponge a fair amount of gold out of the economy given how well the perk matches the target audience.  See this thread (https://www.reddit.com/r/woweconomy/comments/8jqjiv/5_million_gold_mighty_brutosaur_caravan_vendor/) for reactions from people into that side of the game.

Unlike the spider mount, the mount shape may not be unique--there are other datamined recolors, which may or may not be used for mounts.

https://www.wowhead.com/news=284417/battle-for-azeroth-build-26624-new-mounts-and-pets
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on May 20, 2018, 08:16:06 PM
So I've been leveling in beta with War Mode enabled. I'm playing Horde to try to minimize how burned out I get on content, so I can't really give Alliance specifics.

- On beta, the Warmode buff says you get +6 bonus Honor for killing opposing faction players, and +30 bonus Honor for killing opposing faction Assassins (not sure if Horde will have the same term here.) Killing 10 opposing faction players without dying will turn you into an assassin, giving you +15% damage and healing, but making you tasty for Honor for the opposing faction.

- Scaling/PvP damage seems slightly off. I was killed in three hits without escaping the stun from a rogue a level below me, but a 120 enhancement shaman tried to gank me when I was 117 and I kicked his ass. So???

- As part of the leveling experience (unrelated to War Mode) you will do a War Campaign for your faction, and this will involve setting up bases on the opposing faction's islands (one per zone). This and neutral flight masters are where you're going to see the most action from the opposing faction while leveling.

- It's really hard to tell what kind of population you'll see after the opposing faction starts getting its first 120s because right now there are some necessary quests to unlock WQs that are temporarily down so there are a lot of 120s who haven't been able to unlock WQs yet on beta.

- War Mode is SO GOOD for leveling. Two zones got me within half a level of 120, and I skipped quite a few sidequests.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: **andius on May 21, 2018, 05:51:48 AM
Seems to me War Mode is a bit too good, the reward for being in War Mode should be being able to do open world PvP not get better rewards from doing PvE while hoping not to be PvP'ed.

Edit: I hope the XP gains are not balanced around being in  War Mode. Leveling in the beta is faster than it is going to be once it goes live (I believe they have done this in pasted betas?)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on May 21, 2018, 07:12:14 AM
Seems to me War Mode is a bit too good, the reward for being in War Mode should be being able to do open world PvP not get better rewards from doing PvE while hoping not to be PvP'ed.
I believe there are plenty of people who agree with you on the forums, but I think that design position would lead to almost no one enabling war mode, whereas the goal is that people who can at least tolerate world PvP will enable war mode and see if they enjoy it.  MMO players sometimes need to be led by the nose.

Quote
Edit: I hope the XP gains are not balanced around being in  War Mode. Leveling in the beta is faster than it is going to be once it goes live (I believe they have done this in pasted betas?)
There have occasionally been XP adjustments late in the beta process but as far as I recall it does not happen often or as a matter of course.  I would not expect Blizzard to balance XP gains around war mode, in the sense that there should be plenty of quest content (even ignoring many side quests) to level from 110 to 120 without rest state, and it shouldn't take longer than we are used to.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on May 21, 2018, 02:20:57 PM
I think we also need to consider that if you actually end up engaging in PvP when questing, it increases your total questing time. In which case, the bonus XP is outweighed by the overall inefficiency of having to keep getting distracted from your questing by PvP. (That is: assuming the Blizzard fixes some of the weird PvP scaling issues with fresh 120s, War Mode will stop being The Most Efficient Way To Level sometime in the first week of the expansion.)

All that said: I may have understated just how much leveling content I did not do on my way to 120. I did no leveling dungeons. I skipped all but one group quest. I have at least two untouched sidequest hubs in both Zuldazar and Vol'dun, and dinged 120 right after having met Bwonsamdi in Nazmir questing. I got stuck in my War Campaign and was only able to open two of the three Horde ports in Kul Tiras. Due to Pathfinder, AP quests, rep, etc. people who do more than instanced PvP will probably want to complete all three of their faction's zones + the War Campaign, and potentially the post-main-storyline-completion dungeon quest at the end of every zone (gives 1k AP on beta right now, which is p sizeable). I suspect even without War Mode enabled, that will easily get folks to 120, considering how much of an extra berth I had with War Mode.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on May 23, 2018, 06:29:02 AM
Completing a mythic +15 dungeon unlocks a tint for the Balance of Power artifact appearance.  Previously it had been planned that this appearance would be time-limited; today it was announced that it will not be, although you will have to do a BfA mythic +15 (i.e. still moderately difficult content, not trivial old stuff) to get it.  The mage tower base artifact appearances remain time-limited.

http://us.battle.net/forums/wow/topic/20764356714#1
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on May 31, 2018, 07:20:09 PM
hey, Marco, remember how we were discussing what actually got +10%-ed by Warmode? The answer seems to be Azerite, War Resources and Gold. Reputation from WQs is the same regardless of your War Mode situation on beta.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on June 01, 2018, 06:29:29 AM
I can see the reasoning there.  You can always get those three things by playing the game more, whereas sources of reputation can dry up.  So, for instance, if you're a crafter who wants to get the rank 3 Deep Sea Bag recipe as soon as possible to get a jump on that market, you'll want to get revered with Voldunai as soon as you can, and war mode might feel overly mandatory in that situation if it granted bonus rep rewards.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on June 04, 2018, 01:23:21 PM
In their announcement that 32-bit client support would be ending (I believe we knew that was coming), Blizzard recommended updating to the 64-bit client "before July 1, 2018".  That basically rules out the pre-patch landing before July 1 and suggests that it might come as early as July 3, which would yield six weeks of prepatch.  Of course, that date is only four weeks away and it's not on the PTR yet.

https://www.wowhead.com/news=284765/support-ending-for-world-of-warcraft-32-bit-client-this-summer
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on June 05, 2018, 12:41:50 PM
Is there a definitive list somewhere of "this is going away with BfA so if you care about it, finish it now"?

Like, warlock green fire went away at some point and you couldn't do that anymore. I've seen things about various currencies being deprecated and maybe some appearances for weapons we won't be using anyway, but nothing I could find was a definitive list.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on June 05, 2018, 12:59:14 PM
https://www.wowhead.com/what-to-do-before-battle-for-azeroth

Green fire hasn't gone away as far as I know; there are wowhead comments saying people did it at least as recently as 7.2.5.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Jenilea on June 05, 2018, 03:12:03 PM
Like, warlock green fire went away at some point and you couldn't do that anymore.
Green fire is still obtainable - just the title that came with it is no longer obtainable.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on June 05, 2018, 09:01:47 PM
Blizzard has released three comics telling stories related to BfA, all on the topic of troubled families.  The first two are pretty short, and tell us a bit about what Jaina and Magni have been up to.  The third one is longer and depicts a meeting of the three Windrunner sisters.

https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-us/news/21791564
https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-us/news/21797339
https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-us/news/21833317
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on June 06, 2018, 11:33:15 AM
I really like the third one. I hope more of BfA focuses on those stories. The first two were more "meh". I am completely annoyed by Magni Earthspeaker.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on June 07, 2018, 09:25:44 AM
BfA will launch at 6pm Eastern on August 13, six hours in advance of the official launch day in that time zone, so that there can be a simultaneous launch in all regions.

https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-us/news/21849061/battle-for-azeroth-one-launch-to-rule-them-all

(The map graphic says at the bottom that August 13 is a Tuesday, but it is actually a Monday, as noted by many people.)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Piralyn on June 07, 2018, 09:51:29 AM
a simultaneous launch in all regions.

There's absolutely no way this goes poorly.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on June 07, 2018, 10:46:53 AM
That's been a common reaction, but it's not like the different regions share servers, so I don't get it.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Piralyn on June 07, 2018, 12:23:20 PM
That's been a common reaction, but it's not like the different regions share servers, so I don't get it.

I suspect a lot of the reaction comes from people that don't necessarily understand that, sure.

I'm thinking more about the tidal crush of people that are going to be hitting the servers at 3-6PM as opposed to the normal sort of "soft" launch that comes with unlocking at midnight. I'm sure there's also some potential support nightmares from all the regions launching simultaneously rather than in phased approaches--so something that might have been discovered in Region 1 and subsequently had a fix worked on before it hits much later regions or whatever, but, yeah, a 6PM crowd trying to bulldoze into expansion is gonna be a bad time, i think.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on June 07, 2018, 12:33:26 PM
Character copies are available on the latest beta build if that's a thing that interests you. I'll report back later with ilevel info etc.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: jsoh on June 07, 2018, 12:35:36 PM
That's been a common reaction, but it's not like the different regions share servers, so I don't get it.

Blizz has a long and not quite so glorious history of xpac launches, and now theyíre choosing to deliberately up the degree of difficulty?

I devoutly hope to be wrong, but my money is on Pira being closer to the pin here.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on June 07, 2018, 03:52:57 PM
To give a better sense of the stat/item level squish now that we have character copies:
* Legendaries (item level 1000) squish to 265 (and stop working at level 116)
* Naian is 961 equipped on live and 235 equipped on beta
* Here's what the artifact tree looks like on beta:
(https://i.imgur.com/BtoOU28.jpg)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on June 07, 2018, 04:35:23 PM
I copied all of my level 110 characters to see what the range of outcomes is.  My characters above level 920 all dropped by about 720 item levels, while the ones below that dropped by less; my warrior who dinged 110 today at ilvl 753 only dropped by 600 item levels.  That fits with the expectation that the first part of this expansion's item progression mostly disappears into linearity along with all of the previous non-squished expansions'.  I think this might make it easier to level through invasions, which don't award gear like questing does, since there won't be as much of a power difference between level 100 gear and level 110 gear.

I am curious what the initial item level progression is in BfA--quest rewards at level 120, normal dungeon loot, etc..

Someone on mmo-champion noted that auto-completion order hall items turn into gray trash.  So it seems we won't be able to blow up world quests in 8.0 (or perhaps when the expansion launches, but I bet in 8.0).  The demon hunter NPC who normally grants this item in my order hall won't talk to me on the beta and there is no UI element on the world map for auto-completing a world quest.  The class hall upgrade tree hasn't been updated to say something different in that spot, though.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on June 07, 2018, 04:51:03 PM
Rephrasing this whole post, sorry for the complete edit:

* Leveling greens at 120 -- not sure. These got rebalanced after i'd hit 120, but I'm pretty sure they're in the 290 range now.
* Normal Dungeon gear at 120: 310 base
* Heroic dungeon gear: 325 base
* Mythic+0 gear: 340 base
* Rep gear: 325 cloak at Honored (differently itemized by faction), 340 item (non-Azerite) at Honored, 355 item (non-Azerite except from Champions of Azeroth ) at Exalted. Assuming leveling quest rep isn't rebalanced before launch, you're likely to be at or nearing Revered with the 3 leveling reps just from questing the whole zone, which you're gonna do anyway for the pathfinder achievement. (There are 6 reps you'll encounter total so far. Three that match with each of your faction's leveling zones, then Champions of Azeroth/Magni, the Tortollans, and the rep associated with your faction's War Campaign.)
* WQ gear was capping out at 310/315 prior to this build, but with this build I've gotten a few WQs that offered 320 items to me. Not sure where the cap will end up.
* Raid Dungeon Journal seems to be a work in progress, but I'm guessing 355 is the starting point for normal gear.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on June 14, 2018, 10:58:50 AM
8.0 has hit the PTR.  They haven't announced a release date for 8.0 to go live, although early-to-mid-July seems likely.

There was a developer Q+A which I won't have time to watch until later.  From the mmo-champion summary, I see "It is intended that you aren't able to swap gear while inside Mythic+ dungeons."  I don't think many of us were swapping around gear between trash and bosses, but this will suck if you accidentally start a keystone while in the wrong gear set.  (The same problem already applies if you start a keystone with the wrong talents, of course.)

Another change that floated by recently is that "windowed fullscreen" and "exclusive fullscreen" have been merged into just "fullscreen" in the client (for Windows).  This change is apparently driven by DirectX 12.  The main upshot is that you can't make your fullscreen resolution different from your desktop resolution, and if you want to change the gamma you'll have to do that through your graphics card control panel.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on June 14, 2018, 05:36:03 PM
Two things I noted from the Q+A (well, the first half):

* Cross-realm mythic raiding will be enabled once 100 alliance and 100 horde guilds have killed the final boss of that raid on mythic.  I bet that number needs adjusting downward some day.

* Ion said RP servers don't cross-realm with other (presumably non-connected) servers, so in theory the only time you should see players from other realms in the world, including in war mode, is when people have formed cross-realm groups.  I don't know if I believe that given how often I see players from other realms out in the world.  (Although it is consistent with how poorly Argus invasion points worked for us without explicitly using the group finder.)  For example, I just experimentally hearthed to Suramar and I see people from Argent Dawn, Kirin Tor, and The Scryers just hanging around not doing much; it seems unlikely that they were all only here because they're grouped with an Earthen Ring player to hang out at Shal'Aran.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on June 15, 2018, 03:42:43 AM
Perhaps he meant rp realms don't cross-realm with non-rp realms or rp realms outside our initial crossrealm cluster? because we've always been clustered with kirin tor & argent dawn since they started doing "old zone cross realming." This still puts our zone populations much much lower than it is for non-rp servers.

other notes: bellular pointed out on twitter that current ptr build is a more current build than what's on the beta, including some class changes that aren't on beta.

shaman dps players in particular mad about q&a answer about their specs being "whoops we ran out of time, we'll make those changes in 8.1"
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on June 15, 2018, 07:57:02 AM
I've just not been motivated to play in the beta, but my experience in trying to get some things finished up on live convinces me I'll never turn on war mode. In particular, the whole notion of shared rares, non-faction-tagging and such goes immediately to sh*t If you're flagged. Lots of specs AOE as part of their normal rotation, which means you're going to be hitting opposite faction players will you or no. It's going to be impossible to tell that from deliberately hitting people, and people are going to hit back.

The boost for war mode now needs to make up for my inability to hit world rares or shared tag targets, as well as the time I'm going to spend running back to my corpse, which may or may not be camped. Nuh unh. Not gonna happen.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on June 15, 2018, 11:09:07 AM
You're unlikely to see much in the way of opposing faction players if you level in the first week or so of the expac, and that's really where most of the benefit of war mode is. The 10% bonus only applies to the individual WQs and not the emissaries, and AP income from individual WQs quickly becomes a "nice but drop in the bucket" thing relative to your overall AP pool. It might be worth turning Warmode on if you're min-maxing your AP income from WQs, but for most players,you won't be super behind if you don't do it. (Based on incomes on beta you're seeing maybe an additional 25 AP/WQ and an additional 5 resources/WQ in warmode, neither of which are gonna break the bank.)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on June 15, 2018, 02:38:45 PM
There was one more bit of new information in the dev Q+A: Azerite armor (head, shoulders, chest) of epic quality will only come from sources with weekly lockouts [edit: or daily lockouts, like emissary chests], and will binned into 15-ilvl increments.  For mythic+, this means it won't drop from the dungeons themselves, but it can come from the weekly chest.  If it does, it will match the item level of drops from one of the current raid tier difficulties, whereas other types of gear from the chest comes in 5-ilvl increments based on your highest mythic+ completed.

The intent is that you won't be spamming mythic+ dungeons to try to get copies of an Azerite armor piece, and you won't be deciding between ilvl 360 and ilvl 365 Azerite armor pieces based on some spreadsheet of their trait values.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on June 19, 2018, 07:46:39 PM
Order hall upgrades have a non-class-specific analog in BfA.  wowhead has an article on what you can get from the new system as of the latest build.

https://bfa.wowhead.com/news=285040/battle-for-azeroth-new-feature-research-options
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on July 05, 2018, 01:37:03 PM
New beta build increases XP needed per level from 110-120, so like

Probably you will need to complete more than two zones to get to max level now, I guess.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on July 08, 2018, 08:29:26 AM
I missed it at the time, but a couple of weeks ago Ion said some interesting stuff about the pre-patch in an interview with Heather Newman:

* There will be no leveling bonanza in the pre-patch like there was with Legion.  (Although I will reiterate that the stat squish might make leveling through invasions easier.)

* There will be some story scenarios related to Teldrassil which you can do during the pre-patch whether or not you've bought BfA.

* If you've bought BfA, you will likely be able to do the Battle for Lordaeron scenario about a week before BfA launch.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/hnewman/2018/06/26/top-things-to-do-before-battle-for-azeroth-by-warcrafts-game-director/#295c7c2e57b0
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on July 09, 2018, 06:01:16 AM
I've been hearing rumors that a (the?) prepatch was going to drop this week but the schedule for maintenance shows only the usual 1hr down time.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on July 09, 2018, 02:09:13 PM
Pat Krane and Thyst (both popular wow podcasters who I happened to be watching on stream this afternoon) intimated that they had inside knowledge that 8.0 would come out "next week" which likely means the 17th.  I think we'd know by now if it was going to be tomorrow.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Fernia on July 10, 2018, 09:44:15 AM
Although it's tempting to switch to Ferndoyln for the next expansion, to solve our perpetual lack of Druids in the raid ... I think I will stick with Fernia at least to begin with.  Sounds like disco will be more bubble oriented again, and shadow will have shorter / less punishing rotation.  We'll see --- I'm in the middle of endless renos right now, so I might be late to the raid party this time around.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: jsoh on July 12, 2018, 05:28:08 PM
Prepatch coming this Tuesday
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on July 24, 2018, 11:10:26 AM
The first part of the War of Thorns went live today.  It's a short quest line with no cinematics, essentially depicting the opening stages of the war.  After the quest line some world quests open up in Darkshore.  One of them awarded a warglaive weapon for my DH, so I guess there are some transmog rewards here.  My other characters didn't have immediate access to the world quests, so it's possible that you have to run the quest line multiple times to get everything.

Blizzard also released an animated short about Jaina.  "Animated" is maybe a little generous because it's basically still frames, but the artwork is quite good.  It contains a song which will absolutely get stuck in your head.  There are two more shorts coming, one about Azshara and one about Sylvanas (possibly not in that order).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqN5IQD-3L0
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on July 24, 2018, 01:47:26 PM
According to some folks on my Twitter dash, you can talk to your faction leader on alts to skip the story questing and go straight to the new War of Thorns WQs on your alts.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Jenilea on July 24, 2018, 07:59:52 PM
According to some folks on my Twitter dash, you can talk to your faction leader on alts to skip the story questing and go straight to the new War of Thorns WQs on your alts.
Yes, but be sure not to complete the follow on quest to talk to Mathias Shaw. Once you complete that quest, the option to skip Darkshore is gone.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on July 25, 2018, 06:19:37 AM
So, I did the quest chain and it just kind of left me sitting on a dock with Malfurion. I assume that's deliberate, and there will be a continuation of that in the future?

I agree about the Jaina video - it's done in a semi-still anime style that I quite like and I think the artwork is good. Online buzz is that the singer of the song is the woman who does Jaina's in-game voice acting.

I am not at all up on the lore, but I'm told that the video references all the way back to Warcraft III and may hint at characters appearing in BfA that were in the earlier Warcraft games but haven't yet been seen in WoW. Anyone have more info on that?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on July 25, 2018, 07:08:15 AM
Taliesin explains most of it in his analysis video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgN8m09hD7c

For a longer treatment, Nobbel (https://www.youtube.com/user/Nobbel87/videos) is also doing a multi-part rundown of the Jaina story, but I haven't watched it.

I'm not easily finding a good text summary; I'm sure it's out there.  In Warcraft 3 we get to see that Jaina basically sided with Thrall and Rexxar against her father Daelin, and for pretty good reasons.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on July 25, 2018, 08:50:33 AM
Online buzz is that the singer of the song is the woman who does Jaina's in-game voice acting.

Yes, Laura Bailey, who does the in-game VO for Jaina also recorded the voice for the new video.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on July 26, 2018, 08:15:08 AM
It looks like the War of Thorns world quests spawn four at a time at 11am each day.  They all appear to award base-ilvl-210 gear, which is on par with normal Antorus loot.  So while there is no leveling bonanza in this pre-patch event like there was with the Legion one, you can at least gear out alts for slightly faster early BfA leveling.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Fallowgrey on July 26, 2018, 10:59:13 AM
One nice thing to note about doing the Darkshore WQs is the reward of 210 weapons.  For several of my alts these were great replacements for dead artifacts.  It's still possible to pursue relics for artifacts for i-level updates, but not nearly as easily.

I did note that on completing the quest chain on my heroic Antorus geared main, that I'm not seeing the WQs on my map.  I mean, I'd have no reason to pursue 210 gear, but still.  Sweetums found forum posts saying the map might not be showing quest areas that are actually there.  But I've only seen them on "undergeared" alts who could benefit so far.

Also, the gear drops do not seem to have any draw for transmog.  The only set I worked at getting all of, for my hunter, all has the appearance of the base initial set of hunter gear.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on July 26, 2018, 12:45:25 PM
Do you use World Quest Tracker or a similar addon?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on July 30, 2018, 09:16:57 PM
Here's a spreadsheet (not really functionally a spreadsheet, but it's stored as one) with advice on BfA leveling and raid prep.  This is targeted at people who are like 800% more hardcore than anyone I know, but it still might be interesting for people to pick and choose advice from.  The professions page might be the most relevant to some people here.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xHvIxX5TE0ZMYTKBzkaRNFQTJzYQJhhho8KuyK4CB0w/htmlview?sle=true#
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on July 31, 2018, 05:44:45 AM
I was wondering about the value of the weapons dropped from these quests. My guildmate got two of them on his hunter. Both polearms, and both well below the ilvl of the artifact on my lowest-alt-what-has-done-mythics. I imagine it'd be good for alts just hitting 110 but polearms for hunters??
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: jsoh on July 31, 2018, 06:34:46 AM
I imagine it'd be good for alts just hitting 110 but polearms for hunters??

Survival hunters.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on July 31, 2018, 07:36:51 AM
Doing the second week's quests appears to open up a fifth daily.  I didn't see a way to skip the second part of the quest line on alts, though.  (The existing four dailies are still available if you don't do the week quests.)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on August 02, 2018, 07:58:17 PM
Without any advance notice, Blizzard released a fully rendered cinematic about Saurfang and his new BFF.

[ETA: this was apparently revealed at a big Chinese gaming convention called Chinajoy, which helps explain why it dropped at a weird time for the US and Europe.]

https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-us/news/22010730
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aW_h0qf9vpA
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on August 03, 2018, 02:34:50 AM
It was a handsomely produced cinematic.

And yet I'm left with my usual questions: Who were they? (Thanks to Marco, I know one of them was "Saurfang".) Why was Saurfang so sad? Who was attacking? Where? Why?

I'm so confused that I don't even remember where the World Tree that Sylvanas burned was. Was it the big one in Mount Hyjal? There have been so many enormous trees in WoW...
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on August 03, 2018, 06:12:57 AM
The burned tree is Teldrassil, where Darnassus was.  Capital city of the night elves.

Lordaeron (aka the Undercity, capital city of the Forsaken) is being sieged by the alliance, in retaliation for the burning of the tree.  In the cinematic, the alliance forces are just beginning to approach.

Saurfang is sad because he's been fighting for a very long time, he lost his son to the Scourge along the way, and although he reluctantly went along with the invasion of Darkshore, he no longer believes he is on the right side after the burning of the tree.  (ETA: and he's starting to feel regret for some of the past wars he's fought in.)

The troll in the cinematic is a new character to BfA.  He appeared as a random combatant in the original BfA cinematic (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSJr3dXZfcg) (around 2:17).  Fans dubbed him "Zappyboi" and made him a favorite (you can google that name for lots of reddit posts and similar).  I don't think we know his name, but Saurfang calling him "boy" in this cinematic is an obvious nod.  (ETA: or apparently it was just luck (https://us.battle.net/forums/en/wow/topic/20767536619?page=3#47))  (ETA: also, his name is Zekhan (https://twitter.com/TerranGregory/status/1025342185070362624))
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on August 07, 2018, 05:59:01 AM
The two novellas from the collectors edition, Elegy and A Good War, are now available to read online.  (I haven't read them yet.)

https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-us/story/short-story/elegy
https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-us/story/short-story/a-good-war
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: **andius on August 07, 2018, 08:30:40 AM
The Hour of Reckoning is at hand and the reward for the first step is a choice of a blue 180 weapon quite why they would be so low level when at this point you can do a Darkshore WQ for a Purple 210 is a mystery to me.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on August 07, 2018, 08:48:44 AM
I figured maybe they were supposed to be transmog?  (As with all quest rewards, regardless of which one you pick, all of the choices should be added to your appearance collection.)  Also, the Darkshore world quests won't be available after next week while the Lordaeron scenario will be, so in the future this ensures that nobody hits 110 and goes into BfA with a main-hand weapon lower than 180.

I thought the scenario was decently executed, in the context of doing it with 20 people and with the cinematics.  The BfA intro cinematic does not feature here, so I guess maybe all the banshee screaming and mass resurrection happened just before the scenario.


Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: **andius on August 07, 2018, 01:53:39 PM
It was a little to much "Deus Ex Machina Moment" with us along for the ride.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on August 08, 2018, 06:10:52 AM
This thing makes me sad I didn't play it through on the Horde side. Like, what do players there DO? Do they even react when they all get killed by chemical weapons "friendly" fire?

Basically everything in this pre-patch except Jaina is reducing my enthusiasm for the expansion. Jaina is Seriously Badass, but I really do not like the way her character, particularly the face, is rendered in the cinematics. It looks too young, and too simple compared to the elaborate rendering of things like Genn's worgen form.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: erstyx on August 08, 2018, 07:28:44 AM
On the horde side, you start by helping evacuate Undercity, defeating SI-7 infiltrators. Then you port outside and follow the alliance stages (initial attack, defend the azerite machine, spread blight, fight on Nathanos' side inside the keep; there's no equivalent to the wind troll step). You're given gas masks to survive the blight, and you can optionally pick up a blight spreader if you're "feeling sassy". Alternatively, you could earn progress during that step by helping fleeing horde soldiers.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on August 10, 2018, 01:31:23 PM
for the record, both on beta and on live, a large chunk of the players in the Horde-side scenario have opted to click heal dudes instead of spreading blight.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on August 12, 2018, 01:50:37 PM
Succinct guides for BfA dungeons:

http://sunniersartofwar.com/quick-and-dirty-tanking-guides/battle-for-azeroth-dungeons/
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on August 13, 2018, 09:06:12 PM
It seemed like the launch went pretty well for most of us here in low-population-server land, with some disconnects but no major play interruptions for the people I heard from (except maybe one).  Some high-population servers had more serious problems, and some players (no one I know) got hit with a bug where they didn't get the Heart of Azeroth and had to ticket for it.  So, overall not as smooth as Legion, but not as bad as Warlords.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on August 14, 2018, 05:40:34 AM
I and several guildmates had characters get stuck at the start of new areas. At a guess I'd say it's a phasing problem, or possibly whatever server was holding the version of the areas we were in (it happened nearly simultaneously in two different starting zones that we observed). It was the classic "server lag" problem where you can chat in /g but anything you /say doesn't appear, can't interact with NPCs and as soon as you cast a spell or trigger an ability you get locked.

I force-quit the client, and the launcher immediately downloaded a patch. I tried again after that completed and the character got "world server is down" on trying to log in, so I quit again, got ANOTHER patch, waited for that to finish and still couldn't get back to that character so I switched to an alt (still in Dalaran) and that worked. I was able to move that alt through the beginning to the starter city and then swapped back to the first character, which was finally freed up.

So I lost something like half an hour, about two hours after I started playing. I think it's a smart move of them to release on a Monday, with everyone knowing that Tuesday AM there will be maintenance. This gives them a window for putting out needed patches and emergency fixes while the community isn't complaining about extra downtime.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on August 14, 2018, 05:47:55 AM
Safety tip: if you're starting a new character into BfA don't turn on War Mode until you get back from the initial quest in Siithus. Lots of horde camping the portal point and flight points in Uldum to gank people as they come through.

That mini-chain sends you right back to Stormwind at the end so you can still turn on war mode before going to the starter city.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Piralyn on August 14, 2018, 06:44:53 AM
It seemed like the launch went pretty well for most of us here in low-population-server land, with some disconnects but no major play interruptions for the people I heard from (except maybe one).  Some high-population servers had more serious problems, and some players (no one I know) got hit with a bug where they didn't get the Heart of Azeroth and had to ticket for it.  So, overall not as smooth as Legion, but not as bad as Warlords.

Yeah, I was pleasantly surprised and willing to admit I was wrong since I doomsayered the whole Monday afternoon launch thing. I was also pre-logged in, so that might bias my experience a bit. Sounds like some realms were down most of the afternoon/evening, which would obviously be a pretty terrible experience--but a handful being dead while most seemed to be running (relatively) smoothly is way better than I expected with the original announcement.

I wasn't around for Legion's actual launch since I came back a week or two in, but I remember Warlords being a shitshow for like two weeks or something absurd, so good on them for pulling off a simultaneously worldwide launch relatively well, I think.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: ghoselle on August 14, 2018, 12:50:31 PM
I think my biggest complaint is that leveling up feels really pointless.  All the mobs level up with me.  I'm getting no new skills or talents.  All that is happening is my gear is functionally getting worst.   I know at some point I'll level enough where quest gear will start being useful, but I'm not there yet.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Piralyn on August 14, 2018, 01:09:09 PM
Yeah, that's been an on-going problem in the whole genre going all the way back to like Elder Scrolls Oblivion.

I'm at like 115 now and I can still pretty reliably pull a shit ton of stuff, but DKs are traditionally OP in that regard--but I can definitely feel a decline in my kill speed and survivability. I don't feel like it's been as sharp of a decline as I felt in Legion, but I probably had shittier gear back at the start of Legion since I raided for like three weeks here and there in Warlords.

It's definitely becoming more and more of a problem now that there's not a lot of granular improvement. In Legion, you were gaining Artifact traits and relics as you went, which still changed up your character. I don't feel like any of the Azerite armor traits are significant enough to feel like anything's really changing. I understand not wanting to flood the game with another 5-10 skills/spells/talents every expansion, but now that everything truly scales, it just feels like ten to twenty hours of chores before actually getting to improve your character. Level-banding mob scaling in zones might help, but I'm not sure that going back to "everyone does the zones in the same order" is going to be a great user experience for server stability either.

So, I don't know that there's really a right answer here. I have to imagine they're trying to come up with some kind of better plan for future expansions/content. There's no way they're oblivious to it given the vociferous response to making the entire game level scale, but I'm not sure what the fix is. Maybe they thought the Azerite stuff would feel more significant than it has to me (at least) so far.

tl;dr: level scaling has sucked for literally 12 years.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on August 17, 2018, 04:18:30 AM
Please tell me it gets better.

I played BfA for the first time last night. I spent about two hours going through the introduction. Of that two hours, it seemed 10-15 were cutscenes. I know I've fallen behind on my WoW lore, but putting so many cutscenes up front kills the vibe; it's jarring to be interrupted as you're trying to learn how to play a Druid again with another pointless cinematic. The only decent one came at the end of the intro scenario, where Sylvanas confronts the leaders of the Alliance.

Then, after some more cutscenes, I found myself in the starter city. I spent another twenty minutes trying to get around. It reminded me of the bad ol' days of vanilla Booty Bay: You could see where you had to go, but you couldn't see any way to get there.

Part of the reason I had problems is that everything looked so dark. Only at the end did I have the "bright" idea to turn up the System brightness so I could see anything.

I haven't yet left the starter city for the first zone. Does the game settle down, or is this more of what I've got to expect?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Honorata on August 17, 2018, 05:50:26 AM
I also thought the initial questlines had too many cutscenes, and there are more than usual elsewhere, but they're not nearly as frequent as they are in that initial questline. Most of the cutscenes are the new type which use the in-game models, and these occasionally bugged out on me, making them kind of ruin the feel of the story sometimes. Drustvar has the witch thing I recall you not liking, but it's probably the most solid zone story. Tiragarde Sound had my favorite plots, but the order I chose to do the quests (I guess) made the story seem a bit disjointed at times. Stormsong Valley is probably the weakest of the zones, but aesthetically pretty pleasing. Overall, I very much preferred the Horde questing this expansion. (I really liked both Nazmir and Zuldazar on beta, and Vol'dun had the Vulpera.)

Boralus definitely takes some getting used to, but I feel like I can get around pretty easily after a few days of play -- I skip stairs a lot and just use my waterwalking mount to jump into the harbor to get places quickly a lot of the time, though. (There's a rope ladder into the Alliance Boat from the water, so I've found it's faster to jump jump into the harbor and rope ladder onto the boat instead of taking three flights of winding stairs when coming from the flight master or the ferry.)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: HeidiB on August 17, 2018, 07:36:16 AM
So, I don't know that there's really a right answer here. I have to imagine they're trying to come up with some kind of better plan for future expansions/content. There's no way they're oblivious to it given the vociferous response to making the entire game level scale, but I'm not sure what the fix is. Maybe they thought the Azerite stuff would feel more significant than it has to me (at least) so far.
Maybe the extra action buttons in Drustvar are an attempt to deal with this?  I kept forgetting I had the darned things.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Leah on August 17, 2018, 07:46:45 AM
I haven't yet left the starter city for the first zone. Does the game settle down, or is this more of what I've got to expect?

As Honor noted, the beginning in cutscene heavy but, in my experience, that's been about it. I can't honestly remember one in Drustvar, although there are a handful of scripted in-game moments. I personally enjoy the cutscenes because I'm a lore/story enthusiast and it doesn't take me out of the game at all. It certainly doesn't hurt that I found Drustvar to be thoroughly entertaining from a storyline standpoint. (No spoilers, but it does a helluva job at taking a minor character and elevating them to badass status ala Yrel)

Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: ghoselle on August 17, 2018, 08:12:11 AM
Also, you can always just hit "escape" to get out of most of the cut scenes.  I do feel like someone gave them the direction of "show not tell is better storytelling" and now we have more cut scenes than needed.

With that said, getting my second character started, I aggressively hit escape from cut scenes, and it made getting him settled in to the new city pretty quick.  (Tip:  For the 2 big intro bits, after you've done them once on the faction, there is an npc standing beside the quest giver who you can tell 'let me skip this' and will save you having to redo the scenario on each character.)  This is a much better experience than in the past.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on August 17, 2018, 08:37:48 AM
Ooh, thanks for the rope tip, Honor. I have likewise been using my water walking mount a lot. It's possible I will end up hating this new city as much as I hated Undercity. Part of my problem with it is that it doesn't seem to have a logic to its layout. Even UC had "quarters". Flying will make this better, but I feel like they traded off "usable" for "realistic." Lots of interesting NPCs that don't contribute things, winding streets, dead ends. Yep, like a lot of cities and FARKING ANNOYING to navigate.

The zone maps, so far, are way better than usual. They seem to lack the extreme cliffs and invisible walls that force you to go Exactly The One True Blizzard Way from place to place. Hills still exist but they're more often climbable. I do not yet actually hate any of the zone maps. Let me get through all of them and I may have a different opinion.

A core problem, which I think Blizzard ought to solve at the game engine level, is that things in the game give you points, not paths. It would not be hard (and escort quests prove it) to have an in-game navigation aid that takes you from where you are to where the goal is. This could be wrapped in an NPC/follower, an engineering toy, etc. Just like they vastly increased the number of flight points to make the ground-game experience better, giving a way to get path guidance would save me SO many look-ups on external sites.

Speaking of FP, who else is looking longingly at their Flight Master's Whistle? I sure am...
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: jsoh on August 17, 2018, 09:20:09 AM
Speaking of FP, who else is looking longingly at their Flight Master's Whistle? I sure am...

I can infer from this that you're not 120 yet.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on August 17, 2018, 05:41:16 PM
I just did the BfA introduction Horde-side. It's definitely a better experience. The cutscenes are bit more fun to watch, and the "prison" sequence for the Horde is far superior to the "prison" sequence for the Alliance. The starter city is more spread out and it can take a while to get from quest-giver A to quest-giver B, but it's always clear where you're going.

I'll probably go through the Alliance quests first, because I've got a guild there and it's easy to turn to the DCers for advice. But I definitely want to see this expansion from the Horde perspective, especially after going through Legion where the Horde and Alliance experience was nearly identical.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: **andius on August 20, 2018, 12:23:00 PM
I think this (http://darklegacycomics.com/644) comic sums up my questing experience so far :)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Brynndolin on August 20, 2018, 12:55:26 PM
I think this (http://darklegacycomics.com/644) comic sums up my questing experience so far :)

This was a fantastic comic!!

Leveling went really fast for me, even watching the cut scenes. I figure watch them once, then escape out on all subsequent alts. The wet noodle thing is super frustrating and only now starting to get marginally better. I'm hoping they adjust mob density soon-ish since sometimes, especially if I barely survive a three-mob attack, I'm seeing things re-pop already. But - I love BfA so far, and I didn't think I would, especially since the "Horde versus Alliance" thing could not be more beaten to death, imo.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on August 23, 2018, 02:59:16 AM
A commentary on BfA from PvP: http://pvponline.com/comic/2018-08-23
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on August 23, 2018, 11:01:51 AM
Azerite gear will become tradable (subject to the usual personal loot restrictions) starting with the next weekly reset, per today's dev Q+A.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Piralyn on August 23, 2018, 11:32:26 AM
Alongside that great news is this horrifying news:

"There are no plans to lessen the amount of trash mobs in certain dungeons."

BRAH HAVE YOU EVEN MOTHERLODED YET
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Fallowgrey on August 23, 2018, 11:54:31 AM
Alongside that great news is this horrifying news:

"There are no plans to lessen the amount of trash mobs in certain dungeons."

BRAH HAVE YOU EVEN MOTHERLODED YET

I'm hoping for an eventual "there are sekrit plans to add hidden bombs that nuke all the trash once you figure out how to set them off".  That don't involve cannons that kill Johnny.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: jsoh on August 23, 2018, 12:57:37 PM
Hey Pira, your weapon problems are solved!

Quote
The first conquest reward will be an ilvl 340 weapon.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Piralyn on August 23, 2018, 01:34:59 PM
How the hell am I going to win in PvP with a stick of cotton candy
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Fallowgrey on August 24, 2018, 04:47:10 AM
Hey Pira, your weapon problems are solved!

Quote
The first conquest reward will be an ilvl 340 weapon.

You know it'll just be an 1MH.  Good luck getting an OH to replace the box of jujubees currently complementing your cotton candy stick.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on August 25, 2018, 01:56:44 PM
Anyone have a good explainer for the latest Warbringers video? Are Blizzard still claiming this is not an Old Gods expansion?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on August 25, 2018, 02:38:04 PM
I know it's a running joke that there are no old gods in BfA, but I don't recall anyone from Blizzard actually saying that.

wowhead just posted an article here (which I haven't read): https://www.wowhead.com/news=286677/warbringers-azshara-cinematic-analysis-nzoth-nyalotha-circle-of-stars-old-god-wh

Taliesin and Evitel will have their weekly reset video up tomorrow most likely, and the first 25 minutes of it will be Taliesin talking about the warbringers cinematic (from twitter).

The cinematic itself is here (https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-us/news/22358468), if people missed it.  I thought it was on the weaker end of Blizzard's recent video work, but it establishes most of the important plot points about who Azshara is.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Leah on August 25, 2018, 02:51:00 PM
When did Blizzard make any claims about Old Gods regarding this expansion?

The endboss of the first raid is essentially an Old God creature whilst two other bosses are Old God servants. Some of the interweaving storylines for both factions directly reference the Old Gods and/or their servants, including Azshara, who was announced as future raid boss in this expansion.

I would imagine that the storyline is multi-faceted and evolves like in Pandaria and Warlords, though I'm not advocating that Warlords was a particularly well-told story.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Leah on August 25, 2018, 03:23:52 PM
On a more personal note, I find Azshara to be an incredibly dull character so I'm glad that she's not the focus of an entire expansion as others have speculated/wished for. The Old Gods aren't terribly more exciting but at least they're powerful and ominous. Azshara is known to be a powerful sorceress, stronger in power than Mannaroth, but she's still essentially a lackey character in my eyes.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on September 04, 2018, 10:27:21 AM
This has probably already been mentioned upthread, and for all I know I'm the last to see it, but just in case:

Amidst the items you can purchase from the 7th Legion emissary are missions you can send your Champions on. They award new outposts in Zandalar. The outposts include new flight points. They make it easier to get to all those Zandalarian world quests you have to do in order to get flying later in BfA.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on September 05, 2018, 11:30:37 AM
The Kotaku review of BfA. Summary: It's more of the same, and that's a good thing. https://kotaku.com/world-of-warcraft-battle-for-azeroth-the-kotaku-review-1828748442
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on September 06, 2018, 06:36:56 AM
I continue to be remarkably bored by this expansion. The zones are full of petty people with petty problems and it's not at all clear to me why I'm solving their problems for them. I really don't GAF except I need to do all this for flying so, fine.

The new Arathi zone is fun, and I can fly, and it's full of nice gear drops and pets and mounts. This is the sort of thing we normally get near the end of an expansion when it's too late to be meaningful, just a time-killer during the dog days. I give Blizzard major props for dropping this very early in BfA. Of course we'll out-gear these drops pretty soon but pets and mounts and achievements will be a fun diversion from other grinding.

Azerite continues to confuse me - early blue azerite gear seems meaningless as it goes away quickly (esp with the Arathi gear). I guess that's like the learning/training wheels version? At least AP is much better handled this time.

Mushing servers continues to be the worst thing about BfA and it's significantly degrading my experience. Even with war mode off I have to deal with griefers training mobs onto me, griefers camping the spawns so I can't complete WQ, griefers running around killing battle pets (srsly? do you not have ANYTHING better to do? some asshat saw me with my explorer's helm on and literally ran in front of me fan-of-knives on every battle pet.) Basically, I feel like my nice friendly server has been invaded by an entire reddit-worth of trolls and assholes that add no value and significant friction to make the gaming experience much worse.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on September 06, 2018, 10:05:13 AM
Mushing servers continues to be the worst thing about BfA and it's significantly degrading my experience. Even with war mode off I have to deal with griefers training mobs onto me, griefers camping the spawns so I can't complete WQ, griefers running around killing battle pets (srsly? do you not have ANYTHING better to do? some asshat saw me with my explorer's helm on and literally ran in front of me fan-of-knives on every battle pet.) Basically, I feel like my nice friendly server has been invaded by an entire reddit-worth of trolls and assholes that add no value and significant friction to make the gaming experience much worse.

I was about to say that I never experienced anything like this. Then I recall those times when I was in solo combat with a three(+)-man mob or an elite and suddenly their health jumped up. I now realize that this was because a passing griefer took a shot at the mob, then wandered off. I could always handle it (due to Ghoselle's Law), but it's a waste of time.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: ghoselle on September 06, 2018, 01:55:17 PM
Iíve not really experienced any of that griefing.  I did have a rogue who was sitting where the duskvar boat dropped off my fresh 110 who stunned and killed my shaman before I unstunned, and then camped my corpse.  After the 3rd kill I just spirit rezíd and went back to storm wind to turn off war mode (which I donít recall turning on; I mean I was just there to skin...)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Kharvek on September 06, 2018, 02:38:49 PM
I went into this expansion with extremely low expectations.  I've never really been in it for the story, but I find the Alliance vs Horde storylines the single worst part of all of WoW lore just around how little sense it all makes and everytime they wanna reignite it, it's basically a "Some dumbass person ends up in charge and does something really stupid" to stoke the fires again.  Blizzard has always tried to keep both factions as 'generally good guys that just having really stupid misunderstandings" which I think really cheapens any conflict they have.  I sorta hope they keep leaning into "The Horde is evil" now that Metzen is gone and they can stop having such a hardon for Thrall.  It'll at least give a bit more teeth to the conflict.  (But...I bet that won't happen and we'll get some fight against Sylvanas and Saurfang takes over and the Horde becomes 'good' again, the Alliance does something really shitty and stupid to keep the war going because we need a reason for PvP)

...however honestly?  I've been enjoying this expansion way more than I thought I would.  Questing didn't focus on the war nearly as much as I thought it would, which is a very good thing.  I've really been enjoying the smaller stakes of questing after several expansions of saving the world and facing the world beating force of the Legion.  It's been a breath of fresh air to pal around with pirates like Flynn Fairwind and deal with things like the rogue Ashvane faction.  (Any quest with Flynn?  Great.  I loved the one where he's drunk and you pick up a quest while escorting him and he's poking fun at the whole "Yeah, that seems important, go do that")

The one part of the war that does kinda work for me is when we quest in the horde zones.  They legit made me feel like I was in enemy territory trying to be sneaky and do things behind the horde's back.  That?  Worked way more than I thought it would.  When I go to the horde continent, I feel like I shouldn't be there.  On the Kul Tiran place?  I feel like I'm just going around and helping folks with their problems.  Horde?  I feel like I'm sabotaging efforts.  ...so I dislike Horde v Alliance, but...they made it work well in this regard, so props for that.

I've generally enjoyed most of the dungeons.  The fights have been fun and I really liked the football and obstacle courses in Temple. 

Overall I....have enjoyed this expansion way more than I thought I would thus far.  Legion is still a very high mark and they seem to be just doing more Legion stuff...which I'm fairly okay with.


Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: jsoh on September 06, 2018, 03:05:09 PM
I really liked the football and obstacle courses in Temple. 

You're a horrible person.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on September 07, 2018, 04:52:42 PM
Peter Hollens is a YouTube singer, best known for his a capella performances; he lays down dozens of vocal tracks to simulate choruses, musical instruments, etc. Among his repertoire are covers of songs from video games; I first became aware of him from his cover of the Skyrim main theme.

He's just released his cover of "Daughter of the Sea" from the Jaina video. I don't think I've ever seen him cover a song so soon after its introduction. https://youtu.be/cHHKi-IYvvE

If you want to hear that Skyrim cover (with lyrics!): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlCPOCwo3FY
His cover of the Game of Thrones (with Lindsey Sterling): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oNpmSAvpGQ
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on September 08, 2018, 08:45:07 AM
Method (the usual favorite to win mythic world firsts in the last few years) will be streaming their mythic Uldir raid progress.

https://www.method.gg/method-to-live-stream-mythic-uldir
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on September 14, 2018, 05:00:12 PM
After one month of BfA:

I'm with Kharvek. I like this expansion more than I thought I would.

I've rediscovered the joys of playing a Druid again, leveling and questing in tank spec. Because crafting is of limited utility, there's no need to level up many to support each other. Therefore, I've stuck with just one character, and have been able to make reasonable progress. I've even been able to tank a few dungeons; it's early enough in the expansion that folks are willing to accept my "I've never been here before" excuse. Gearing up via world quests has been easier than I expected; I won't be tanking Mythic dungeons or anything like that, but I've gotten to ilvl 330+ with casual effort.

I'm still annoyed with the amount of grinding needed to for BfA Pathfinder Part One, a prerequisite for flying. Even so, at this point I only lack the Tortollan Seekers and Champions of Azeroth rep.

Armor crafting still seems fairly useless, but I've discovered a new use for it, at least for leatherworking: skin + shoulders + scrap, farming for Expulsom. Then use the Expulsom to make the gear upgrades for the Champions. I'm not happy with the lack of Champion of upgrade gear except through expensive profession crafting, and even with it the Champions' missions seem pretty mild compared to the more significant rewards in Legion.

Having seen the Witches of Drustvar, I found that despite Honorata's assurances I feel offended by the approach Blizzard chose. Rather than go into my usual tedious detail, I'm going to write a post on my blog about it and link it here... someday.

After I get BfA P1, and until we know what BfA P2 will require, I plan to level up my Horde Warrior to see how the game looks from that faction's perspective. Then I want to see what playing a Demon Hunter looks like, even though I probably will stop after I've finished whatever unique starting DH quests there are. After that, I may try leveling up a Void Elf Rogue, for the joy of two-shotting mobs for a while.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on September 17, 2018, 06:26:21 AM
Quote
Armor crafting still seems fairly useless

I think it depends on when you are able to do what. I got bored of grinding WQ last night and started another alt (not least because it has herbing). The character had a good supply of cloth because I'd accumulated drops from other characters and I was able to make 5 useful pieces for myself as soon as I hit level 111. Those five are still better than quest rewards at 112.

ION it's nice doing all your leveling on rested XP...
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on September 17, 2018, 06:50:42 AM
You're right. I didn't mention it, but I experienced the same thing: Leatherworking was useful when I hit 111, and again when I just hit 120, for just those 5 pieces. Then that's it.

If you've got alts that wear the same type of gear (in theory, after Theadora the Druid I've got a monk, rogue, and demon hunter) then armor crafting is useful for those two points in a character's advancement. In my case, since I don't plan to take those alts to 120 (though who knows), it doesn't matter much.

I'd prefer an armor-crafting system where more advanced pieces would either require huge amounts of easy-to-obtain items, or require a few rare drops from easy-to-find nodes. For Leatherworking, the ilvl 355 gear requires many drops from Mythic instances, which I personally don't do and (check me on this) for which it's likely that a Mythic dungeoneer would find better pieces drop anyway.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on September 17, 2018, 07:01:06 AM
The mythic gate is going to be interesting. Certainly the Mythic gear is better than M0 drops. I'm told that no modifiers are imposed on M+ until you hit M4 and I saw a lot of people running +2 and +3 but I couldn't get in to see what the quality of gear there is. All my experience with M+ is from the last expansion when I had end-of-xpac level gear and I could tune the difficulty to my character and skill. I did everything from +8 to +16 regularly, depending on which toon I was on.

With set pieces no longer in the equation it's entirely possible that M+ gear will outperform (at least non-azerite) raid drop gear so that's a thing. Icy-veins already has tables up of preferred azerite gear (since different gear gives different specials) so it may be the case that people hit specific M+ if the preferred azerite gear drops there.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on September 17, 2018, 07:49:55 AM
The 355 BOP pieces were of some interest for raid prep based on what I read in guides for higher-end raiding.  There are certainly other ways to get 355 gear without too much fuss, so it was a question of how quickly you wanted to get that slot up to 355.  Those pieces can also be upgraded to 370 and 385 with raid drops.  Whether the upgrades are worth it depends on your luck with raid drops and your diligence in crafting a 355 piece with just the right secondary stats.  You might get a titanforged 385 piece with good stats from heroic before you accumulate enough Sanguicell for the upgrade to 385, for instance.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: jsoh on September 17, 2018, 10:20:53 AM
I'm told that no modifiers are imposed on M+ until you hit M4

This is not correct. Tyrannical/Fortified start at M+2. Next breakpoints are at +4, +7, and +10 (Infested).

In terms of the ilvl of gear that you get from M+, its banded, and there's a fairly useful chart at wowhead that I don't have the time to snag, that lists all the details. IIRC, Normal Uldir gear ~= +5(ish), Heroic Uldir ~= +7/+8(ish). What you get from the weekly chest follows different rules, and I refer you back to that wowhead list.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on September 17, 2018, 01:18:40 PM
I think jsoh may be referring to this page (scroll to the end for the relevant chart): https://www.wowhead.com/mythic-keystones-and-dungeons-guide
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: jsoh on September 17, 2018, 06:49:53 PM
Thats the one.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on November 03, 2018, 10:33:08 AM
I kept one of my resolutions for BfA and ran a Demon Hunter through its starting quests; with heirloom gear I went from level 98 to 102, including the artifact quest.

Overall: Meh. I had problems with some of the encounters, which I know means I wasn't using the DH skills very well. I can see the class is well-suited for the experienced twitchy player, which is probably why only players who have leveled other toons high enough can play DH.

As a story, I like the Death Knight introduction better. It was better written, there was more time to "breathe" (the DH introduction is one long sequence without any breaks), and there was more of an emotional investment in the personality changes for your toon.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on November 04, 2018, 07:27:49 AM
Blizzard released a new cinematic at Blizzcon, "Teatime with Anduin and Saurfang""Lost Honor": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKZ7ygLTR0g

There was also this question at the WoW Q+A:
Quote
Q: How are you going to differentiate between what Sylvannas is doing and what Garrosh did?
A: The story's not done. Can't really answer, much left to discover and explore. If I were Sylvanas looking at what Garrosh hath wrought, i'd probably think Garrosh was an amateur.

The implication is that while the Sylvanas story might be retreading the Garrosh story in many respects, we shouldn't expect a similar resolution.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on November 05, 2018, 05:32:10 AM
Is anyone else annoyed AF that the Alliance are losing and King Pretty Boy is all "let's cozy up to the old Orc dude while the most powerful mage who hasn't pulled a vanishing act (*cough*Khadgar*cough*Velen*cough*) is rotting in a mundane jail somewhere".

I mean, seriously, at least try for a prisoner swap or something. Pay ransom. What the actual?

Are Blizzard afraid to show on-screen two actual powerful female characters? Maybe even at once?  I'm not 100% convinced Jaina could take Sylvannas but I'd love to see her try.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on November 05, 2018, 05:50:23 AM
Who's rotting in jail?  Jaina has been rescued (not from the horde) and is leading the Kul Tiran navy at this point.  Khadgar wants no part in the faction war and is not working for the alliance.  I can see that Velen is mentioned in Elegy, but I still haven't read that, so I don't know what he's been doing offscreen.

The alliance does appear pretty weak in everything revealed on live thus far, but I think the 8.1 war campaign will change that.  (That said, if the horde is fractured along whether Sylvanas is honorable enough to lead, the alliance is perhaps fractured along how aggressive it should be and which races' major concerns to address with its limited forces.  If my pie-in-the-sky theory is right and Blizzard wants to make the factions fall apart at the end of the BfA story, Anduin can't be shown as a great and successful leader.)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on November 05, 2018, 09:34:30 AM
What I'm annoyed AF at the moment (at least in WoW) is that unlocking the Dark Iron Dwarf Allied Race requires killing a dungeon boss; the Horde equivalent race does not require this. Now that we're three months into the expansion, I don't think folks are willing to accept "This is my first time" as an excuse anymore, so this locks out this Allied Race for me until 9.0.

Not that I planned to play a Dark Iron Dwarf (I'm having enough fun with my Void Elf Rogue), but it's the principle of the thing.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: ghoselle on November 05, 2018, 10:29:20 AM
What I'm annoyed AF at the moment (at least in WoW) is that unlocking the Dark Iron Dwarf Allied Race requires killing a dungeon boss; the Horde equivalent race does not require this. Now that we're three months into the expansion, I don't think folks are willing to accept "This is my first time" as an excuse anymore, so this locks out this Allied Race for me until 9.0.

Not that I planned to play a Dark Iron Dwarf (I'm having enough fun with my Void Elf Rogue), but it's the principle of the thing.

If I'm around, I'll tank whatever you need. 

-Ghos
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on November 05, 2018, 10:41:47 AM
If you queue up for Motherlode on normal as DPS, I wouldn't expect any difficulties even if you haven't been there before.

My understanding is that the equivalent horde quest chain requires some difficult solo encounters which some players aren't able to beat, so it's kind of a mixed bag.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on November 05, 2018, 11:36:59 AM
I've got one spec at 120: a Guardian Druid. So I'd playing the role of an ignorant tank, the most annoying kind. (I've tried to become a tank who rushes from one combat to the next so the healers can't recover their mana, but I'm just not fast enough.)
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on November 05, 2018, 04:02:36 PM
Who's rotting in jail?  Jaina has been rescued (not from the horde) and is leading the Kul Tiran navy at this point.


I missed this somehow? I've got one character that's done all of the current flight prereqs, so what am I missing and how do I get it?

Quote
Khadgar wants no part in the faction war and is not working for the alliance.  I can see that Velen is mentioned in Elegy, but I still haven't read that, so I don't know what he's been doing offscreen.

Khadgar certainly relied on Anduin and Stormwind when it was convenient for him, but fine. Velen also has historically acted to prevent massive bloodshed but maybe he DGAF anymore.

Quote
If my pie-in-the-sky theory is right and Blizzard wants to make the factions fall apart at the end of the BfA story, Anduin can't be shown as a great and successful leader.

I'm not sure what the game would look like in that event. So much of the game is based on the two sides - obviously PVP but also faction-tagging for mobs, who you can instance with, control of zones, etc.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on November 05, 2018, 04:37:31 PM
Complete the Kul Tourist achievement (lots of questing), then do a long quest chain involving several dungeons.  That unlocks Siege of Boralus, which has a cut scene at the end.

Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Leah on November 05, 2018, 06:41:30 PM
so this locks out this Allied Race for me until 9.0

Not that I planned to play a Dark Iron Dwarf (I'm having enough fun with my Void Elf Rogue), but it's the principle of the thing.

It sounds to me like this lined up perfectly!
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on November 06, 2018, 06:40:04 AM
Complete the Kul Tourist achievement (lots of questing), then do a long quest chain involving several dungeons.  That unlocks Siege of Boralus, which has a cut scene at the end.

I would then guess that the vast majority of players are like me and don't do arduous achievements and so have no idea that there's a crucial(?) story development there. I mean, why would Blizzard put a key story element behind such a thing anyway? After doing the major and attention-grabbing preview video it makes no sense to me to put a major step in her story so far off the beaten path.

So I sort of stand by  my previous statement - I'm irked and I continue to think this expansion's story is awful.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on November 06, 2018, 07:39:18 AM
If nothing is gated, it all arrives in the player's lap in a random order, which can be fine, but in this case would have resulted in a pretty jumbled story.  You'd be solving the mystery of the missing fleet in Stormsong Valley after you'd already seen it restored.  Gating story behind story doesn't seem so bad, although there probably should have been a quest breadcrumb to indicate that there's something behind the Kul Tourist achievement.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on November 06, 2018, 09:19:16 AM
I'm going to side with Snique here, for fairly obvious reasons: the Siege of Boralus is a Mythic instance. That means it's effectively shut off from casual gamers like me. The end of the story is only accessible to those with the gaming skill and enough companions with similar skills to tackle a Mythic dungeon.

I'm going to assert something I think is difficult to prove (and perhaps defend): The kind of player who would go through all the dungeons in the LFD list systematically is not the kind of player who'd be particularly interested in the story. If they did a Normal Siege of Boralus instance before doing a normal MOTHERLODE!! instance, they wouldn't care; they probably would be skipping through the cutscenes.

I got caught up enough in the story to go through three instances a second time, just to free Jaina. It was still early enough in the expansion to save me from total embarrassment and a vote to kick me out. The actual Jaina rescue was interesting, though not the best storytelling I've seen Blizzard do. Then to see the final resolution: better get a Mythic party ready if you want to see it, or else view it on YouTube.

So the gamers who get the see the whole story must be both motivated by the tale, and be of an upper echelon of gamers. I haven't liked this in past expansions (to see Garrosh's fate you had to do an LFR at minimum) and I don't like it now, especially since there's no LFD for Mythics.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on November 06, 2018, 10:18:56 AM
OK now I'm even more confused. I wasn't sure about Kul Tourist achievement so I went and checked. I've done Pathfinder, as I said, so I know the bit that comes at the end of that third of the zone questlines but afaik that just ends with
SPOILER BELOW
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The overthrow and flight of the despot power behind the throne and then a "let's talk" bit. Jaina never shows up, afaict. What's this about instances?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on November 06, 2018, 11:28:23 AM
Go and talk with the Habormaster of Boralus. He's such an interesting fellow.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Leah on November 06, 2018, 03:27:09 PM
Spoilery stuff

MORE SPOILERY STUFF!










The major component of that end questline is saving Jaina from the Blighted Lands and reuniting her with her mother. You have to travel to a far away island in the questline so it's all pretty memorable stuff, imo.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Leah on November 06, 2018, 04:04:42 PM
Siege of Boralus is a Mythic instance. That means it's effectively shut off from casual gamers like me. The end of the story is only accessible to those with the gaming skill and enough companions with similar skills to tackle a Mythic dungeon.

So the gamers who get the see the whole story must be both motivated by the tale, and be of an upper echelon of gamers. I haven't liked this in past expansions (to see Garrosh's fate you had to do an LFR at minimum) and I don't like it now, especially since there's no LFD for Mythics.

This is where the argument goes off the rails to me. LFR, to be perfectly fair and honest, is the most mindless content in the game, especially for a group setting. It was introduced as a way for people who either wouldn't or couldn't do standard raiding to see the story and get some loot above standard dungeons. If the expectation is to have the entire story unfold from questing, it would be a single-player game and that's obviously not what WoW is.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on November 07, 2018, 04:16:08 AM
I have a feeling that your experience with LFR is different from mine. The last time I used LFR was in Pandaria, and things might have changed since then. When I was grinding for some pet or other in Pandaria LFR, it was a disorganized mess, including lots of wipes and (believe it or not) anti-semitism. So I fully agree with the adjective "mindless". There is certainly no incentive for me to do LFR just to see the end of a story.

"If the expectation is to have the entire story unfold from questing, it would be a single-player game and that's obviously not what WoW is." Half of me wants to agree and the other half disagrees, at least with the reasoning. Since the latter half presently controls my fingertips, I'll say (again, perhaps weakly) that if the entire story could be revealed through single-player questing, for the majority of players who do instances and raids it wouldn't change the game at all, since they explore that content for gear, community, achievements, collectibles, or just to see it all.

The other half of me is gaining control of my keyboard, so I can now also acknowledge that I may be whining about the need to go through Mythic Siege of Boralus for the end of that story. It's easy to imagine that Blizzard would introduce Normal or Heroic versions of that instance over time. I don't know the fate of Mythic dungeons once their associated expansion is over; if I were willing to wait until 9.x all the story-curious people could just solo it.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Leah on November 07, 2018, 06:54:15 AM
I'm not going to lie and say LFR is some paradise but more often that not, it's a fairly mundane experience as long as you don't run it the day/week of release of the raid wing. I also turn off instance chat because of the toxicity but I also have general/trade chat turned off most of the time as is.

As it pertains to story, I genuinely feel that there's a sweet spot that Blizzard tries to present when it comes to end-game content. You get rewarded with gear, an achievement, and a sense of completion by seeing the storyline through. I don't actually know too many people personally who are fans of WoW's lore and I'm married to someone who cares less than zero about the story so maybe I'm just projecting my own feelings onto it. Point is, if the story came only through questing, it would be quite a letdown because there's not much of a challenge to it at all.

It's easy to imagine that Blizzard would introduce Normal or Heroic versions of that instance over time. I don't know the fate of Mythic dungeons once their associated expansion is over; if I were willing to wait until 9.x all the story-curious people could just solo it

If they continue the path from Legion, Mythic only dungeons will become available on lesser difficulties as the expansion progresses.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Marco on November 07, 2018, 07:00:32 AM
Quote
I've got one spec at 120: a Guardian Druid. So I'd playing the role of an ignorant tank, the most annoying kind.
After thinking about this I believe you'd probably still be okay.  The audience for normal Motherlode should mostly be people in your situation: people who have some reason to run that dungeon who aren't confident enough to run it on a higher difficulty, mixed with some undergeared 120s who are trying to get from ~285 to 305.  The people you're worrying about should mostly be queueing for heroic.  Importantly, Motherlode is not an alliance leveling dungeon, so you won't get 111s who outgear you in level-relative terms.  Motherlode is trash-dense, so you'd wind up pulling a bunch of unnecessary stuff, but I don't think most people in the normal-dungeon audience would care.

I think every mythic-only dungeon has historically gotten a heroic version in a later patch, but Blizzard didn't mention doing that for Siege of Boralus and King's Rest in the What's Next panel (I think), so I'm not certain it's happening this time.  You've certainly always been able to go back and solo them later.
The interweaving of those two dungeons with faction storylines is certainly galling to a couple of categories of players, but Blizzard has generally been willing to take that hit from time to time.  (Remember having to PvP to get your legendary cloak?)  Perhaps it's a failing, or perhaps it's important to try to draw players out of their rut occasionally; I don't really know.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on November 07, 2018, 11:20:17 AM
Go and talk with the Habormaster of Boralus. He's such an interesting fellow.

I'm assuming this was to me? I am in that space often for turn-ins of WQ and my weekly chest. There's no indication that he's talk-to-able, or that I should. Should I just click on random NPCs in order to advance the storyline? Or am I missing something else?
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on November 07, 2018, 12:48:46 PM
After you completed the Kul Tourist achievement, the Harbormaster should have offered you this quest:

https://www.wowhead.com/quest=52194/what-you-may-regret

Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Winston on November 07, 2018, 02:26:19 PM
I finally got around to writing a blog post on the Witches of Drustvar (https://argothald.com/2018/11/07/the-witches-of-drustvar/). I'm not copying it here because it's too long and even more trivial than my complaints about Mythic Siege of Boralus.

I should acknowledge that, to everyone on this forum, the first several paragraphs read like "The Bobbsey Twins play World of Warcraft." Not all of the three or four people who read my blog play WoW.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: ghoselle on November 07, 2018, 06:36:03 PM
Honestly, all they had to do was change the word from Witches.  It was diverged enough from reality it'd have been fine. 

Its awkward, because it bothers me; and at the same time I think Drustvar is the zone I enjoyed the most despite that.
Title: Re: Battle for Azeroth
Post by: Snique on November 08, 2018, 05:59:52 AM
After you completed the Kul Tourist achievement, the Harbormaster should have offered you this quest:

https://www.wowhead.com/quest=52194/what-you-may-regret

I think I figured it out. I've got a dungeon to run. I just ignored that as I was moving on to M+. I figured it was just another "kill an end boss and booyah" thing, not a major plot development.