Author Topic: Let's talk about mobile games  (Read 1015 times)

Marco

  • Three Rivers Member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6378
Re: Let's talk about mobile games
« Reply #30 on: March 21, 2017, 06:55:32 AM »
Fallout Shelter is also an interesting case study in microtransactions.  Josh Allen's criticism (from his DGYHU podcast) was that they flubbed the microtransaction model, or maybe shouldn't have had them as the game was mainly an ad for Fallout 3.  (Caveat: if there have been any significant changes to the game since I played it, I probably missed them.)

In Fallout Shelter, your goal is to help settlers survive in the wasteland.  To do that you have to manage your base and build it out.  As you build out your base, threats increase and survival gets harder, but as you level and equip your settlers it gets easier to handle these threats.  Once you have a lot of high-level geared up settlers, base management is easy and you might feel like you're done with the game because you aren't making decisions.  An abusive business model would have been to make it very slow to level and gear settlers without microtransactions, so that the player feels like they are drowning unless they spend money.  Microtransactions could also have been necessary to correct mistakes in your base build-out without starting over.  In this model, the game might not have been very fun for players who didn't spend money, which might have made it a bad advertisement for Fallout 3.

So instead, the game flows pretty well if you don't spend any money.  If you do spend money, you reach "the end" very quickly and you feel like the game is really short.  I think this became even more the case when the game introduced robot units (I never saw these), as they take care of the easy management busy work for you, leaving you with a completely self-running base.

Gwyddyon

  • The Fired Lord
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2056
Re: Let's talk about mobile games
« Reply #31 on: March 21, 2017, 09:25:24 AM »
I've been playing Fire Emblem Heroes which is a thing, I guess. The internet loves it, then they change one thing and the internet hates it. Whatever.

The game is based on Nintendo's Fire Emblem property which has been stateside for about 5 games and 15 years.

Gameplay basically consists of snack-sized puzzle levels populated by units that fight using rock-paper-scissors rules with each unit bound to rock, paper, or scissors (with some 'neutral'). Under certain circumstances, you can get scissors units to beat rock units but that's an uphill climb; it's usually much easier to deploy paper instead.

Being F2P, the power mechanism is related to what units you draw from the 'gacha' mechanism and many of the units are from games that never made it stateside, so while you might want to play with favored units from games you are familiar with, that will likely not be the most effective path and you may end up using units you may never have heard of or care nothing for the lore of.

I enjoy it because 1) I like to collect characters and 2) I like the snack-sized puzzles.

Content Warning: For some stupid reason, 90% of the female characters don't wear pants and really ought to (in the manner of many anime-based properties). All the guys wear fancy armor but the women wear fancy breastplates and stupidly short skirts.
Gwyddyon | Gwyllow | Gwyah | Gwystal | Eckhardt | Gwymbulvetr | Tethys | Gwynyang | Gwyabolic | Gwynchester

Snique

  • Cupcakes Member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1753
Re: Let's talk about mobile games
« Reply #32 on: March 22, 2017, 08:57:56 AM »
Is it designed for a touch screen computer or large tablet, while you're running it on your phone?  If not, sounds like bad UX.

That's unclear. I know it's available through the Apple store/iPad. I might try playing it on my pad and see if it's any better.

Snique

  • Cupcakes Member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1753
Re: Let's talk about mobile games
« Reply #33 on: May 23, 2017, 05:59:06 AM »
Another of the things I'm noodling at and y'all are free to skip...

I think I've uncovered a fundamental flaw in my thinking about mobile game economics. There isn't any good map to "game" economics. If you think about a board/tabletop game, or a PC game, you're buying an item. You might buy add-ons, or expansions, or DLC, but those are largely optional.

Mobile gaming, by contrast, seems to be much more a "hobby" model. You can buy a train set, but that's only small part of what you could get. You can add on more track, more buildings, more engines and cars, more decorative items, and build out your installation. Maybe you have different buildings or terrain pieces you change out to model different seasons - I once knew a guy who had a "4th of July" train set and another "Christmas" set. The question "how many outfits can Barbie have" isn't a question people tend to ask - they more go into "how many outfits and cool cars do I have?" and Mattel keeps churning out more to keep people engaged with the hobby.

Thus goes mobile gaming - there are an infinite number of features and "packs" you buy and that have impact on your gaming. Free to play, pay to win is a wholly acceptable model - and a side effect of this is that skill largely no longer factors into the conversation. There's no discussion of "skill" any more than you have skill in your stamp collecting. It's just a question of how many rare or unusual stamps have you been able to buy.

HeidiB

  • Cupcakes Member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1963
Re: Let's talk about mobile games
« Reply #34 on: May 23, 2017, 08:04:59 AM »
I think some modern card and board games have caught on to the practice of selling expansions or alternate rule sets:  Dominion, Carcassonne, Trivial Pursuit, and Magic come to mind.

The question of whether success in the game depends on skill might be platform-based in another way.  In January I read _The Art of Game Design_, which described different gaming environments like hearth, workbench, and reading nook.  I played Words With Friends much differently than I play World of Warcraft, and if I played Ascension the same way I played Bridge I'd be much better at the game!  Where and how a platform is used affects what kinds of games will be successful on that platform.  So it may be that the sorts of skills you enjoy exercising are more suited to a workbench setting than a reading nook setting.

Or maybe not!  What do you think?